Cognitive Intemporality

[Popcorn Sutton]

There are reasons I'm posting this in theoretical physics and not in speculations, and the reasons are two things, you can investigate this claim, and, it directly relates to spooky interactions.

 

In another thread, I mentioned an established hypothesis in linguistics called linguistic intemporality. I decided to broaden the definition because it seems to hold for behavior altogether. The hypothesis is this. Given a set of particles (lets call them concepts), if they all have the same exact shape and structure, then they are the same particle (concept) regardless of their location in space or time. The reason this conclusion was drawn was because of an experience that can be and has been replicated many times. It's based on this example though. The OP of the hypothesis was watching an episode of jeapordy one day where he noticed that the contestant wasn't playing intelligently, and the OP quickly spotted the concept that the contestant was operating on, and that concept was (a cocky, ambitious) strategy rather than intellect. Well, as soon as the contestant decided to operate on strategy, he answered the question incorrectly, to which the OP shouted an obscenity at the television (d***h***). To the surprise of the OP, the contestant reacted as if he literally was standing in the same room and just got called a d***h***. Ok, maybe its a coincidence. Well, he posted his findings and defined a clear way of investigating this hypothesis (which can be done by any average joe). The experiment goes as follows. Next time you experience a pre-recorded phenomena (such as an episode of jeapordy or a song on the radio), when you think that you relate completely with a concept being posed, talk (or yell obscenities) to the person that has been recorded and see if there is a reaction. Well, I have tested this hypothesis several times and the results seem to be statistically significant. There does seem to be a response to the stimulus on the part of the pre-recorded person as if they are indeed there listening to you even if the material was recorded years ago. This is taken as evidence for cognitive intemporality, meaning that a communication can take place across space and time if the exact same concept exists within the minds of the participants. There is a requirement for this phenomena to occur, and that is that the two participants need to have equal concepts and the communicative event must occur within the causal proximity of the concept (meaning that the concept needs to be impacted or shaped by the communicative event in some way). This hypothesis acknowledges that the future can affect the present, the present can affect the past, and the future can affect the past, but the past takes time to affect the present or future. This kind of study also suggests that the "voices" in your head are not entirely yours (which is a thesis that is growing to be accepted) and could have come from the future. It's a spooky interaction, and the reasons of why this occurs are not clear yet, but there is a group of people who have accepted this hypothesis, done the experiment, and confirmed the results. It's far from mainstream at the moment, but I have little doubt that it will come to be known as a truism over time.

 

I have speculations on why this event takes place, but I wont speculate unless it is permitted.

[ydoaPs]

!

Moderator Note

Moved to Speculations

[Popcorn Sutton]

Well since it's in speculations now, I will speculate (one of my favorite things to do).

 

Spooky interactions are the result of an interaction between the poi and the npoi (point of interest and next point of interest). Even if there is a length between them and objects connected to each, they are still essentially the same, empty, point. If one acts directly on a poi, and hence, giving it mass, if the mass is not already within the knowledge, then the mass will get connected to the npoi. If the mass is in the knowledge, then the poi will become the npoi (essentially skipping over the mass connected to the poi) and hence, traveling through space, and also traveling through time. When the poi becomes the npoi, then the process of segmentation continues, in which case, if the poi is not in knowledge, it will reduce itself to something that is in the knowledge, and then become the npoi again (in which case it skips the distance again), repeat the process until the poi and the npoi have no length, in which case they assume their original state (the empty sequence, gravity, the mind, time). When the poi and the npoi have no length, then time is essentially frozen for those particular sequences and no computations can be taking place.

 

This is an extremely efficient process for fully reduced units, however, when the process is performed on large datasets, the computation becomes slower.

 

I should also add that in every case, if the poi is directly influenced by input, the npoi is put into the knowledge before it becomes a part of time, so the npoi is one fully merged unit while the poi is empty. Then the process of segmentation occurs to find what is currently in the knowledge that is connected to the npoi.

 

I should also say that radiation is probably what makes these things recognizable and that it probably requires a membrane.

[Popcorn Sutton]

Segmentation is being used interchangeably with reduction here.