Popcorn Sutton Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 My theory states that time is the length between two point. If there is no length, there is no time. Is that a contradiction? If so, why? I'll have to look into Lorentz equation, but it seems to be consistent with my observations. -2
swansont Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 ! Moderator Note Split. OT for a QM thread, and hijacking since it's a personal theory. Popcorn, this needs to stop.
Popcorn Sutton Posted March 12, 2013 Author Posted March 12, 2013 I didn't mean to be personal about it, it's widely accepted that things have length. And to prove myself wrong, you can find things without length in time, but it's only found at the beginning, never from within the entire sequence... computationally, time being a string.
md65536 Posted March 13, 2013 Posted March 13, 2013 I think you're right... I think that distance is meaningless except as a measurement of relationships between events, which are separated by information traveling at c, and so any non-zero time could consistently be associated with a non-zero length, but I don't think it could be proven. And to prove myself wrong, you can find things without length in time, but it's only found at the beginning, never from within the entire sequence... computationally, time being a string.I doubt that either of us are conveying meaning precisely enough to have a useful conversation though... :S
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now