OxygenBlue Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 Hi there Would it be possible to make a continious radiowave in a certain direction, and then find the spots where -in the line of propagation- the radiowave couldent be measured? I mean, if the radiowave have a wavelength of two meters, the wave would only cross the line of propagation three times, so along most of the line of propagation, the wave couldent be measured. Thanks for any input! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 If you tried to detect at the null of the oscillation you would have trouble measuring it, but detectors of that sort are not small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OxygenBlue Posted March 17, 2013 Author Share Posted March 17, 2013 If you tried to detect at the null of the oscillation you would have trouble measuring it, but detectors of that sort are not small. But in the case, that the detector was in the size range of the wavelength, would it be possible to place it in the line of propagation, in a fashion where it wouldent pick up a signal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 But in the case, that the detector was in the size range of the wavelength, would it be possible to place it in the line of propagation, in a fashion where it wouldent pick up a signal? A detector designed to detect the signal, like an antenna, is optimized (to some extent) to detect the signal. But you can see the effect of nulls in a field if you are trying to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OxygenBlue Posted March 17, 2013 Author Share Posted March 17, 2013 A detector designed to detect the signal, like an antenna, is optimized (to some extent) to detect the signal. But you can see the effect of nulls in a field if you are trying to do that. I'm just asking to know the theoretics, and the wave thing baffled me. I'm not sure what the "effect of nulls in a field" means? I attached a picture of the situation. I know the antenna should be the size of the wavelength, but please imagine it being a coil-antenna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 Its usually called fading. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I'm just asking to know the theoretics, and the wave thing baffled me. I'm not sure what the "effect of nulls in a field" means? I attached a picture of the situation. I know the antenna should be the size of the wavelength, but please imagine it being a coil-antenna The point where the field crosses the axis it has zero amplitude. You couldn't detect it there with a small enough detector and a sufficiently coherent source. It's not normally a problem because detectors are not small and signals not coherent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now