Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
newbie said in post #50 :

As for MS fixing exploits quickly I will only give a quick example which you yourself said; MSBlast.

Fixed *after* a worm brought half of the internet to a grinding halt. Thanks Microsoft!

 

[b}Also here is a good link for Linux since its so much better than XP right?[/b]
I didn't say it was "better than XP", don't put words in my mouth please. In any case, I'd be suspicious of thier numbers. This type of research seems to take "Linux" to mean an entire distribution, which usually includes every application under the sun. It makes sense that an install of an operating system plus supporting applications has more bugs than an install of just the OS.
  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

A 3-month study is neither here nor there, especially with unadjusted data.

 

And, as one commenter pointed out under the article, had it taken Slammer into account the conclusions might have been quite different.

Posted

They don't give any sources for thier data either, apart from a vague reference to a "database" of "attacks" they've had since 1995.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.