battycoati Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 I've been thinking about the common properties between waves of electromagnetic radiation and waves of macroscopic things like water... eg. we understand them in terms of wavelength and frequency. Isn't that a pretty big coincidence? Why is this so? And is this actually so? For example, have we actually unified any of the equations or is it just convenient to use the word wave? First post be gentle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 For example, have we actually unified any of the equations or is it just convenient to use the word wave? Both the equations for water waves and electromagnetic radiation look the same, they are the wave equation. Solutions to the wave equation are waves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robinpike Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 I've been thinking about the common properties between waves of electromagnetic radiation and waves of macroscopic things like water... eg. we understand them in terms of wavelength and frequency. Isn't that a pretty big coincidence? Why is this so? And is this actually so? For example, have we actually unified any of the equations or is it just convenient to use the word wave? First post be gentle. It is just convenient to use the same term - a wave in water is the movement of quadrillions of water molecules moving against each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enthalpy Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 Great physicists in the past were puzzled by this analogy and wanted electromagnetic waves to be the vibration of a support: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether but the search for this support gave a decidedly negative result http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment even with theoretical refinements like aether drag. For over a century, this quest is abandoned in favour of Relativity, which succeeds since then in each and every test, and far more convincing to me, is used daily by millions of engineers and physicists to make correct predictions. Frankly, any attempt back is vain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 It is just convenient to use the same term - a wave in water is the movement of quadrillions of water molecules moving against each other. However, the wave equation does not describe the motion of the molecules themselves. It tells us the bulk motion of the water, and the transfer of energy and momentum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
battycoati Posted April 21, 2013 Author Share Posted April 21, 2013 Thanks for your responses. I'm going to study waves to see how these things are possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnStu Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Okay allow me to list out the waves for clarity: sound waves, water wave, light they are the three primal waves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Okay allow me to list out the waves for clarity: sound waves, water wave, light they are the three primal waves Based on what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now