the idea of teleportation

[derek w]

Does nature work on the principle of teleportation,with confined quarks acting as anchorage points?

Most of the other particles can be converted to energy and recreated somewhere else.

[krash661]

Michio Kaku: The Metaphysics of Teleportation

 

 

Opening a portal to another universe

 

 

Quantum Teleportation

 

http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_project.php?id=2862

How this is accomplished is usually not explained in detail, but the general idea seems to be that the original object is scanned in such a way as to extract all the information from it, then this information is transmitted to the receiving location and used to construct the replica,

this article has great info,there is info that pertains to your question,

 

 

How Teleportation Will Work

http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/teleportation.htm

Edited April 22, 2013 by krash661

[swansont]

In physics, teleportation does not convert a particle to energy and recreate the particle somewhere else.

How Teleportation Will Work
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/teleportation.htm

 

 

Gah, what a horrendous article.

 

Teleportation involves dematerializing an object at one point, and sending the details of that object's precise atomic configuration to another location, where it will be reconstructed.

 

No, what happens is you destroy the information about the state of the particle, not the particle itself.

 

Rule of thumb: if a teleportation article mentions a Star Trek transporter analogy, it's crap. The only allowable mention is to explain how quantum teleportation is not in any way like Star Trek transporter technology.

[krash661]

yeah, the IBM article is the best,

 

http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_project.php?id=2862

Edited April 22, 2013 by krash661

[swansont]

Also Kaku is not to be trusted on the topic of entanglement or teleportation

http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/6138

http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2010/06/23/the-physics-of-the-imbecile/

yeah, the IBM article is the best,

http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_project.php?id=2862

 

Even that mentions destruction of the original and implies that Star Trek style teleportation violates no laws of physics. It's only later in the article you learn that they are speaking of states bing disrupted.

[krash661]

Hmm, interesting.

 

can you provide accurate info on this ?

is there other articles, papers or something on this ?

Edited April 22, 2013 by krash661

[derek w]

In physics, teleportation does not convert a particle to energy and recreate the particle somewhere else.

If a photon has a frequency of 10^15,do we know what a photon is from one femtosecond to the next femtosecond.

The uncertainty principle says it's momentum and position cannot be known simultaneously.

[Phi for All]

Also Kaku is not to be trusted on the topic of entanglement or teleportation

 

Reading one of Kaku's books led me to Physics Forum and then here almost a decade ago. He's always been (to me, at least) the popsci hook that hopefully grabs your interest so it can be funneled into a more meaningful and accurate understanding.

 

Hot dogs are tasty but steak will make you strong.

[swansont]

If a photon has a frequency of 10^15,do we know what a photon is from one femtosecond to the next femtosecond.

The uncertainty principle says it's momentum and position cannot be known simultaneously.

 

And? That has nothing to do with making a particle disappear and reappear somewhere else.