gwiyomi17 Posted May 2, 2013 Posted May 2, 2013 Are stoichiometric calculations an effective way to predict limiting reagent and excess reagent? This is one of the questions asked from the lab report that I am doing. My problem is how to explain this, I know that it is an effective way because I got the limiting reagent in the experiment same as my calculations. But I think that's not a proper way on how to explain this. CAn someone help me please?
krash661 Posted May 2, 2013 Posted May 2, 2013 oh my, i have not touched Stoichiometry in a while. interesting. most stoichiometric problems can be solved with these four steps, balance the equation. convert units of a given substance to moles. using the mole ratio, calculate the moles of substance yielded by the reaction. convert moles of wanted substance to desired units. i'm not sure if that will help you.
gwiyomi17 Posted May 2, 2013 Author Posted May 2, 2013 oh my, i have not touched Stoichiometry in a while. interesting. most stoichiometric problems can be solved with these four steps, balance the equation. convert units of a given substance to moles. using the mole ratio, calculate the moles of substance yielded by the reaction. convert moles of wanted substance to desired units. i'm not sure if that will help you. Thanks for your respond , but I don't think it is not the answer to my question. It's like how is stoichiometric calculation an effective way of predicting the limiting and excess reagent ??
pwagen Posted May 2, 2013 Posted May 2, 2013 Without being in any way, shape or form proficient in chemistry, I would say yes, simply because that seems to be exactly what this paragraph suggests. A stoichiometric amount or stoichiometric ratio of a reagent is the optimum amount or ratio where, assuming that the reaction proceeds to completion: All of the reagent is consumed, There is no deficiency of the reagent, There is no excess of the reagent. A non-stoichiometric mixture, where reactions have gone to completion, will have only the limiting reagent consumed completely. Source
krash661 Posted May 2, 2013 Posted May 2, 2013 (edited) ok, there's a lot to explain here, i'm not much of a typer so i'll refer you to this link, i've skimmed through it.it appears everything you need is there. http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/limitn.html edit- ahh yes, try that link pwagen provided. Edited May 2, 2013 by krash661 1
gwiyomi17 Posted May 2, 2013 Author Posted May 2, 2013 Without being in any way, shape or form proficient in chemistry, I would say yes, simply because that seems to be exactly what this paragraph suggests. Source ok, there's a lot to explain here, i'm not much of a typer so i'll refer you to this link, i've skimmed through it.it appears everything you need is there. http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/limitn.html edit- ahh yes, try that link pwagen provided. That makes sense, maybe I could just add some information about the result of the experiment. Thanks guys!
pwagen Posted May 2, 2013 Posted May 2, 2013 maybe I could just add some information about the result of the experiment. Feel free to. Always interesting to see what people come up with.
gwiyomi17 Posted May 2, 2013 Author Posted May 2, 2013 (edited) 1.) Summarize your findings. Are stoichiometric calculations an effective way to predict limiting reagent and excess reagent? Explain.Accordingto the findings of this experiment, the reaction between the 2 g of cupric chlorideand the 0.5 g of aluminum would yield aluminum chloride and copper precipitate.The experiment shows that the aluminum is the excess reagent because of theunreacted pieces of aluminum still floating on the solution while the cupricchloride is the limiting reagent. The theoretical findings proved that thealuminum is the excess reagent and the limiting reagent is the cupric chloride becauseof the calculated number of moles of the product. Hence, a stoichiometriccalculation is an effective way to predict limiting reagent and excess reagentwithout conducting actual experiments. 2.) Suggest reasons why the percentage yield of the reaction was not 100%?If a yield is 100%, it means that no product has beenlost. But if the yield is 0% it means that no product hasbeen made. The reasons why the percentage yield of a product might be less than100%, includes when: There were some impurities in the materialsused.The chemical reaction did not go to a completion.Some of the reactants were used and some wasleft or did not react during the chemical reaction. The reactants may notalways exist in the proportions written in the balancedequation.Hi guys! I'm back. I used your suggestions in answering the second question. Do you mind checkin my answers? thanks. Edited May 2, 2013 by gwiyomi17
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now