DimaMazin Posted May 14, 2013 Posted May 14, 2013 You should shoot by muons and photons in different directions.You should recieve photons reflected by the muons.You should fix arrival time of reflected photons,energy of the photons and energy of the muons.Then calculations can define a direction where a muon can live longer.
ajb Posted May 14, 2013 Posted May 14, 2013 From what I can gather, the angular dependence of muon detection rates agrees with the predictions, which are based on the fact that the cosmic rays travel through more of less of the atmosphere relative to your detector. This provides no evidence of a prefered direction to time dilation. Also, all the other experiments that test special and general relativity suggest no prefered direction.
DimaMazin Posted May 14, 2013 Author Posted May 14, 2013 (edited) From what I can gather, the angular dependence of muon detection rates agrees with the predictions, which are based on the fact that the cosmic rays travel through more of less of the atmosphere relative to your detector. This provides no evidence of a prefered direction to time dilation. Also, all the other experiments that test special and general relativity suggest no prefered direction. All experiments used distance therefore they did not detect anything.My experiment uses only time.This can be way to success.Certainly muons and photons should travel in vacuum. Edited May 14, 2013 by DimaMazin
DimaMazin Posted May 18, 2013 Author Posted May 18, 2013 Of course distance exists in my experiment,but my experiment doesn't need measured distance.This freedom has a sense in pure studying of time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now