big bang inflation theory vs New

[abisha]

time to ditch big bang inflation theory, for a new one.

I call it the Blackhole inflation theory, both are relative same basics.

 

only few key structures are remade first this bigbang have troubles with *what become with*

i watch a lot of documentary's they all point out to 3 possible futures.

 

now a blackhole inflation theory, don't have trouble with what was first.

example, blackhole do not need matter to create a massive gravity well and can be foundation on gravity problems what exist in today's theory's.

 

second,

It can explain why higgs can be unstable without ever being enable to explode whole Universe.

 

third,

what become, is not a issue we exist inside a blackhole universe from a other universe that have most likely other physics, and can possible even explain QM

 

I based this on higgs, for being unstable.

[pwagen]

Sounds great. Can you describe your theory for us?

[ACG52]

Great. Does your hypothesis predict the relative abundances of primordial hydrogen, helium, lithium and deuterium? Does it predict the black body spectrum of the CMBR? Does it explain cosmological red-shift? If so, please provide the calculated percentages.

[Klaynos]

And some mathematical discussion of how you derived those percentages.