Alan McDougall Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Are the universal fndamental constants realy constant? There has been speculation that the speed of light is slowing down, I readup on this and accurate measurement taken of LS over years has apparently showna slowing, thereof? Was this just due to ever and ever more accurate methods of measuring or doyou think this idea has any merit.? If this idea is really right why should the other constants be constant? Creationists use this idea with glee trying to tell us during theearly universe Light Speed, was much much faster, which explains, somehow that godmade the whole universe in just six literal twenty-four hours days. In my opinion, the constants need to be constant or theuniverse will decay, and fall apart into chaos, in a much more rapid rate thatis allowed by the second law of thermodynamics, Entropy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Generally one looks at dimensionless constants like the fine structure constant or the proton/electron mass ratio. The speed of light could change but have some other "constant" change in direct proportion, and we'd never notice it. Evidence of changes in these parameters is slim — unconfirmed experiments, where some kind of bias has not been eliminated by experiments using other techniques. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted May 27, 2013 Share Posted May 27, 2013 If I was going to seriously consider any constant as having changed over time, I wouldn't look at c but at G, the gravitational constant. It would have the most ( but still very little ) probable cause and the most 'convenient' results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 If I was going to seriously consider any constant as having changed over time, I wouldn't look at c but at G, the gravitational constant. It would have the most ( but still very little ) probable cause and the most 'convenient' results.Dirac I think was the first to propose that G may not be constant and evolve in time. However, as swansont points out the experimental evidence for the evolution of physical constants is slim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havok88 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Could be that the "constant" of LS is effected at a quantum level by a number of other forces causing the entropy. Remember that, as proposed by M theory, all particles (including light) are connected to all others in the multiverse which would cause a great deal of stress I would think. Entropy would then be a natural reaction to that stress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now