ovidiu69 Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 Is it possible that nuclear physics and financial markets to fallow the same laws of Nature? This paper suggest that. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251876307_Quantum_Tunneling_of_Stock_Price_in_Range_Bound_Market_Conditions
swansont Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 "Laws of nature" is a reach, since financial rules are of our own making. Does the same math sometimes apply to physics and finance? Sure. Happens quite a bit, which is why Wall Street hires physicists.
Bill Angel Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 I only read the abstract, but one statement in it is worth commenting on: "The equation is identical with a time-independent Schrodinger equation but incorporates elements of finance" I'm skeptical of time-independent equations accurately quantifying risk in the financial markets. For example, no time independent equations would have quantified the risk of the effects on the markets of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks BEFORE the attacks occurred, or of the more recent melt down in the real estate markets.
ovidiu69 Posted July 30, 2013 Author Posted July 30, 2013 Bill, the paper only emphasize with the probability with certain price movements in the market if some particular conditions apply. It not, by any means try to predict market behavior as a whole. Quantum physics is already weird enough even without a quantum tunneling in financial markets.
swansont Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 I only read the abstract, but one statement in it is worth commenting on: "The equation is identical with a time-independent Schrodinger equation but incorporates elements of finance" I'm skeptical of time-independent equations accurately quantifying risk in the financial markets. For example, no time independent equations would have quantified the risk of the effects on the markets of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks BEFORE the attacks occurred, or of the more recent melt down in the real estate markets. In general that's not a problem; the time evolution can often be tacked on later (i.e. the variables can be separated).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now