A Tripolation Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 To begin with, I'm in my first real mathematics course this semester. Most of my work has been concentrated in physics and I have no background in analysis and only some basic set theory. The question is: Let [latex] R^\infty[/latex] be the set of all infinite-tuples [latex](x_1, x_2,...)[/latex] of all real numbers that end in an infinite string of 0's. Define an inner product via [latex] \left\langle x,y \right\rangle = \sum_{i=1}{^\infty } x_i y_i[/latex] Let ||x-y|| be the induced metric on [latex] R^\infty[/latex]. Let [latex] e_i[/latex] be the vector with a 1 in the ith entry and a 0 in the other entries. These form a basis for [latex] R^\infty[/latex]. Let X be the set {[latex]e_i[/latex]}[latex]_{1\leq i \leq \infty}[/latex]. Show that X is closed, bounded, and non-compact. I understand the formulation of the summation for the dot product and the formation of the basis using those vectors (it forms a linearly independent set that spans the space, IIRC my algebra correctly), but I don't know where to start showing that this set is closed. Or bounded (why would an infinite set be bounded?). I have some notes on compactness, but the concept is quite foreign to me. Any further explanations on the topic would be quite beneficial to me. Thanks!
ajb Posted August 29, 2013 Posted August 29, 2013 By definition a closed set is one whose complement is an open set. You have a metric and so a topological space, so this should make sense. For boundedness, you have a metric space and so can consider balls. You need to think of subsets contained in finite radius balls. A metric space is compact if it is complete and (totally) bounded. I hope that gives you some clues. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now