A Fatal Flaw In Relativity

[Humblemunn]

Testing, yes. But you said modeling of time, not the testing. The theory was developed well before QM was developed, and as I said, the atomic theory is pretty good.

"But you said modeling of time", ...no, I'm only interested in modelling how the clocks interact with assumed spinning Archimedes screw gravitons. The pendulum makes intuitive sense. The atomic clock 'ticking' faster in a lower flux of gravitons suggests to me that we need a FULL understanding of atomic theory before we can understand the "why?".

Edited August 29, 2013 by Humblemunn

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

 

New theory of time, gravity which affects only fluids, etc. split off to new thread.

 

This thread is on Relativity, Grandfather Clocks, and time measurement - keep it that way please. Next serious diversion from the op will be filed in the trash.

 

 

[swansont]

"But you said modeling of time", ...no, I'm only interested in modelling how the clocks interact with assumed spinning Archimedes screw gravitons. The pendulum makes intuitive sense. The atomic clock 'ticking' faster in a lower flux of gravitons suggests to me that we need a FULL understanding of atomic theory before we can understand the "why?".

Gravitons are not part of relativity; in this regard it is a classical theory.