Visionary Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) To what limit can I reach with the decrease of the Coefficient of Friction? Say we have a surface that is 0.1, is it possible to make it 0.01 or 0.001? I believe it might be probable. By perfectly(well, semi- perfectly) cutting the surface of the materials, and also adding ultra-lubricants to the mix to get such a result. Edited August 29, 2013 by Visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionary Posted August 29, 2013 Author Share Posted August 29, 2013 Is it possible to drop the coefficient of friction from 0.1 to 0.01 or 0.001? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enthalpy Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 I achieved about 0.02 static friction at a screw+nut with the proper lubricant. I've never read a lower value reported. What do you mean by "perfectly cutting"? "Flat" for instance doesn't essentially reduce friction. Plastics even rub less against a somewhat rougher metal. If you guarantee a minimum speed, then hydrodynamic bearings can achieve an extremely low friction. 0.001 is realistic then. Or use ball bearings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionary Posted August 30, 2013 Author Share Posted August 30, 2013 I discovered a carbon coating material that will soon be commercialized. And the numbers are amazing! check this. This coating could make the COF = 0.001 - 0.006 Now that's almost frictionless! My goal is to reach such a number in our mechanics. And I think that will happen very soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endercreeper01 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Hmm.. This seems interesting. I think you might. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 What you have to remember is that the coefficient of friction refers to both contacting surfaces. So any statement of the type " The coefficient of friction of steel, rubber, carbon coating...is x" is basically meaningless. You need to state "carbon on carbon", "steel on ice" or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Visionary Posted August 30, 2013 Author Share Posted August 30, 2013 Thanks Studiot, I knew that. If this new technology is commercialized we can created two surfaces and coat this bad boy on them. And its pure carbon(or diamond), not a good conductor of heat or electricity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now