Amazing Facts About Spontaneous Human Combustion

[paul_m]

The alleged burning of the human body without any external source of ignition is called the Spontaneous Human Combustion or otherwise simply called as SHC. In other words Spontaneous Human combustion is simply means that complete incineration of the human body. There are so many speculations and controversies over SHC. Let us see few of them.

Let us view the Spontaneous Human Combustion in spiritual terms. Spontaneous Human Combustion trigger when all the seven chakras are open resulting in kundalini activation. As enormous amount of energy is liberated in the process of kundalini activation the human body burnt thoroughly.

In other words; our body is protected by translucent membrane which shields from the outer magnetic forces when kundalini is activated the bio plasma body is fragmented which results in the rupture of the protective membrane there by large amount of electrical discharge. This electrical discharge makes the internal organs to combust suddenly. In spontaneous human combustion the torso is burnt completely where us the extremities untouched. Since most of the physical bio molecular energy is transmitted through the torso, it is severely affected.

 

Let us view this in different way, our body template is based upon the scalar wave patterns when your mind is guided appropriately with the help of yoga and meditation we can alter the scalar wave pattern including the DNA template. When kundalini is activated life force energy is activated through the spine which is an electromagnetic current through the bio electric field which results in Spontaneous combustion.

The Hindu religious reformer in the 20th century, Ramalinga Addikalar undergone a physical Ascension without experiencing death.

 

Article Source: http://www.elixirofknowledge.com/2010/12/amazing-facts-about-spontaneous-human.html

[Humblemun]

I prefer the acetone production hypothesis by Brian J Ford Professor's breakthrough on human combustion theory but with the trigger being an intermittent force from exotic fluid matter at the Earth's core.

 

There was an interesting Daily Mail article on the subject just recently Can a baby just burst into flames? This child is claimed to have spontaneously combusted FOUR times. Crazy? A new theory offers a tantalising explanation.

 

 

Like many mothers, Rajeshwari Karnan was delighted when she gave birth to a son. The 23-year-old farm labourer and her husband, Karnan Perumal, 26, already had a two-year-old daughter, but like many in the state of Tamil Nadu, they considered a boy a particular blessing.

So when Rahul arrived in May, they were especially delighted.

However, just over a week later, their joy turned to misery.

One afternoon, says Rajeshwari, she was washing her daughter when she suddenly heard Rahul screaming from inside the hut. She ran towards him, but before she could get there, a neighbour shouted to her the words she will never forget: ‘Your baby is on fire!’

‘There was a flame on his belly and his right knee,’ Rajeshwari told the New York Times last week, ‘and my husband rushed with a towel to put it off [sic]. I got very scared.’

The couple immediately took their son to hospital, but the doctors were mystified.

Later, the parents returned home, hoping this bizarre and disturbing occurrence would not repeat itself.

 

 

 

Edited August 29, 2013 by Humblemun

[Thorham]

I think it happens when the invisible dancing goblins on our heads get angry, and pour an invisible flammable liquid over the body which they then set on fire.

[Moontanman]

There is a technical term for SHC, it's on the tip of my tongue... Murder! yes that's it...

 

http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/a_fiery_death_murder_or_spontaneous_combustion/

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_human_combustion

The case you cite with the baby is not as well supported as you insinuate...

In August 2013, Rahul, a two and one half months-old infant from [/size]Tamil Nadu, [/size]India, was admitted to the Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital in [/size]Chennai,[/size]^%5B2%5Dhaving had four reported burn injuries since birth.[/size]^%5B26%5D Initial tests[/size]^%5B27%5D and further results ruled out any abnormalities,[/size]^%5B28%5D leading the hospital to determine "that it was not spontaneous human combustion."[/size]^[2

Suggested explanations[edit source | editbeta]

Many hypotheses attempt to explain how SHC might occur but according to those that rely on scientific understanding, incidents that might appear as spontaneous combustion actually had an external source of ignition – and the likelihood of true spontaneous human combustion is quite low.[8] Benjamin Radford, science writer and deputy editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer, casts doubt on the plausibility of spontaneous human combustion, “If SHC is a real phenomenon (and not the result of an elderly or infirm person being too close to a flame source), why doesn’t it happen more often? There are 6 billion people in the world, and yet we don’t see reports of people bursting into flame while walking down the street, attending football games, or sipping a coffee at a local Starbucks.”[9] Paranormal researcher Brian Dunning states that SHC stories “are simply the rare cases where a natural death in isolation has been followed by a slow combustion from some nearby source of ignition.” Other stories of people suddenly aflame should be called “Unsolved deaths by fire”; just because the cause was not discovered does not mean SHC occurs.[10]

 

 

 

Natural explanations[edit source | editbeta]

• Almost all cases of SHC involve persons with low mobility, due to advanced age or obesity, along with poor health.^[11] Victims show a high likelihood of having died in their sleep, or of being unable to move once they had caught fire.
• Cigarettes are often seen as the source of fire, as the improper disposal of smoking materials causes one of every four fire deaths in the USA.^[12] Natural causes such as heart attacks may lead to the victim dying, subsequently dropping the cigarette, which after a period of smouldering can ignite the victim’s clothes.^[13]
• The “wick effect” hypothesis suggests that a small external flame source, such as a burning cigarette, chars the clothing of the victim at a location, splitting the skin and releasing subcutaneous fat, which is in turn absorbed into the burned clothing, acting as a wick. This combustion can continue for as long as the fuel is available. This hypothesis has been successfully tested with animal tissue (pig) and is consistent with evidence recovered from cases of human combustion.^[14][15] The human body typically has enough stored energy in fat and other chemical stores to fully combust the body; even lean people have several pounds of fat in their tissues. This fat, once heated by the burning clothing, wicks into the clothing much as candle wax (which typically was originally made of animal fat) wicks into a lit candle wick to provide the fuel needed to keep the wick burning.^[16]
• Scalding can cause burn-like injuries, including death, without setting fire to clothing. Although not applicable in cases where the body is charred and burnt, this has been suggested as a cause in at least one claimed SHC-like event.^[17]
• Brian J. Ford has suggested that ketosis, possibly caused by alcoholism or low-carb dieting, produces acetone, which is highly flammable and could therefore lead to apparently spontaneous combustion.^[18][19]
• Sometimes there are reasonable explanations for the deaths, but proponents ignore official autopsies and contradictory evidence, in favor of anecdotal accounts and personal testimonies.^[20][20][13]

 

http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/unexplained-phenomena/shc.htm

 

 

[John Cuthber]

I think that, at least in many cases, the phenomenon is due to something rather dull

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/158853.stm

[Humblemunn]

Professor Brian J Ford explains the phenomena extremely well:

 

[swansont]

I prefer the acetone production hypothesis by Brian J Ford Professor's breakthrough on human combustion theory but with the trigger being an intermittent force from exotic fluid matter at the Earth's core.

 

!

Moderator Note

This isn't your thread, and introducing speculative answers to the question is thread hijacking. You need to stop doing this.

[Humblemunn]

Okay, my apologies, this is different to my previous forum. I'll make sure I start speculative threads myself for these kind of discussions.

[Explendidos]

The majority of scientists are agree that in the beginning of the Universe, so called Big Bang, Matter and Anti-Matter fight of the existence. As we all know regular Matter won, but with how much? They also agree that theoretically Anti-Matter exist today, but they don't know where... and since we're all made out of stardust, I think the evil trigger is that in some people is Anti-Matter present. They are like neutrinos...So small, that they can go right through solid ground and also you without collide with any particles. But when they do, they will annihilate each-other in a burst of energy.

[ajb]

They also agree that theoretically Anti-Matter exist today, but they don't know where...

We detect antimatter all the time.

 

The problem you are initially referring to is the imbalance of matter-antimatter as created in the early Universe. This has little bearing on the natural production of antimatter we see all the time. For example, inverse beta decays.

 

 

and since we're all made out of stardust, I think the evil trigger is that in some people is Anti-Matter present.

Okay, but we would also see lot of other things annihilate. And in fact we are bombarded by antiparticles in the form of cosmic rays all the time.

 

They are like neutrinos...So small, that they can go right through solid ground and also you without collide with any particles. But when they do, they will annihilate each-other in a burst of energy.

This is poorly stated, you mean that they do not interact very readily. Anyway, why do we not see other things just burst into flames? We should see this all the time if your idea is anywhere near correct.