Alternative to the force of gravity

[skeptic1]

There is not a force of gravity coming from the sun. There are thousands. There is a separate force for every object in orbit around the sun. These forces behave the same but are independent and do not affect other gravitational forces. The force of gravity between the sun and Jupiter does not affect the planets orbiting between the sun and Jupiter and their forces of gravity. When there is a lunar eclipse the moon produces two different forces of gravity, one towards the earth and a stronger one passing through the earth to the sun. The moon-sun force does not effect the earth. This is different from all other forces which are uniformly produced and decrease in strength in a constant manner.

The next problem with the theory of gravity is the increase in energy of falling objects. To explain this potential energy was created where energy was stored in mass and then through unknown means converted to kinetic energy. This may be plausible for objects on earth but becomes complete nonsense when considering asteroids which can fall to many different objects and where changing positions means constant changing potential energy. The potential energy for all possible targets of the asteroid must be stored. If the asteroid approaches earth and kinetic energy increases does the mass decrease or increase as the potential energy for all other targets increases As the velocity increases as mass is converted to energy does the mass increase at the same time as Einstein says?

The theory of gravity does not explain why the moon's gravitational pull produces a high tide on the far side of the earth or why the sun with its greater force does not produce a similar high tide at noon and midnight.

Finally there is the evidence from space exploration that shows that the law of gravity is wrong. The masses of the moon and planets are found using the law of gravity. According to the calculations the moon and mars should have significant lower density than the earth. The data from the probes going to both mars and the moon show that they have a higher density than the earth.

There needs to be a theory that addresses these failures.

When Newton proposed the theory of gravity he made the assumption that a object would continue in a straight line unless a force acted upon it. Nothing travels in a straight line, not even light so how do you determine what a straight line is?

In this theory we will assume that an object will maintain its energy unless it absorbs or radiates energy.

Next we will say that energy is a thing not a property or another form of matter but one of the fundamental building blocks of the universe. Matter gives an object substance while energy gives it structure. Matter produces an electrical field while energy produces an energy field.

Energy fields of different objects can combine to form larger objects.

Finally objects in an energy field will equalize with the energy field in which they occur.

The sun is the center of the solar system's energy field. If you multiply the energy of the planets (velocity squared) times the distance from the sun you get the same value, the energy of the solar system. The same is true when you multiple the energy of satellites orbiting earth and their distance from the earth giving the energy of the object earth. The planets and satellites and planets orbit because they are in equilibrium with energy field in which they exist. If energy is added to a satellite it is no longer in equilibrium and radiates energy moving into a weaker energy field and ending up with less energy than it began with. If you decrease the energy of a satellite it moves into a higher energy field gaining energy and ending up with more energy than it started with. An object falls not because it is being pulled towards the earth but because it is not in equilibrium and moves into a higher energy field gaining energy. Object try to equalize with the energy field.

The earth and moon's energy fields combine to form the earth moon unit which orbits the sun. Where the energy fields of the earth and moon combine their is a higher energy level. Water trying to equalize with the higher energy level falls up creating high tides. Since the earth-moon is in equilibrium with the sun it does not cause a daily tide but only when its energy field aligns with the earth-moon's does it increase the energy field causing a higher tide.

Each planet has different energy levels and this is where the theory of gravity causes the errors when calculating the mass of planets.

This theory makes more sense in explaining the phenomena called gravity and explains the failures of the theory. If the rate an object falls or the velocity of a orbiting object have nothing to do with their mass why would these actions be a function of their mass?

 

 

[swansont]

There is not a force of gravity coming from the sun. There are thousands. There is a separate force for every object in orbit around the sun. These forces behave the same but are independent and do not affect other gravitational forces.

Forces are vectors and obey superposition, so saying there are many forces is not technically wrong.

 

The next problem with the theory of gravity is the increase in energy of falling objects. To explain this potential energy was created where energy was stored in mass and then through unknown means converted to kinetic energy. This may be plausible for objects on earth but becomes complete nonsense when considering asteroids which can fall to many different objects and where changing positions means constant changing potential energy. The potential energy for all possible targets of the asteroid must be stored. If the asteroid approaches earth and kinetic energy increases does the mass decrease or increase as the potential energy for all other targets increases As the velocity increases as mass is converted to energy does the mass increase at the same time as Einstein says?

Conservation of energy is well tested and confirmed.

 

The theory of gravity does not explain why the moon's gravitational pull produces a high tide on the far side of the earth or why the sun with its greater force does not produce a similar high tide at noon and midnight.

On the contrary, Newtonian gravity does explain the tides, and quite well. The problem is that you must properly apply the physics. Tides arise because of a difference in force at two points and, as such, it in an inverse-cube relation. The result is that the moon, being closer, has a greater effect on tides.

 

Finally there is the evidence from space exploration that shows that the law of gravity is wrong. The masses of the moon and planets are found using the law of gravity. According to the calculations the moon and mars should have significant lower density than the earth. The data from the probes going to both mars and the moon show that they have a higher density than the earth.

Citations, please.

 

As for the rest, you need to come up with ways of testing your conjecture. How is this falsifiable?