Popcorn Sutton Posted September 25, 2013 Posted September 25, 2013 (edited) connect = context.find (poi) Prompt = connect[len(poi):] This is called prompting. When it's recursive, it's quantum prompting. At this point, things are mostly grammatical when it only prompts what is within knowledge. Anything outside of knowledge usually gets ejected and not prompted. While poi in connect and len (poi) != 0: While unit in knowledge: unit = prompt + prompt[0] prompt = prompt[1:] This becomes a part of time, but it's considered output. Output or emerging depending on its location. When it's in knowledge, it's linear. It looks like it's minimal for the most part, but thats only because it's more efficient. If it was maximal, it would acquire knowledge very rapidly, but the efficiency would limit it's capabilities. It's up for debate whether one or the other will have more data. Edited September 25, 2013 by Popcorn Sutton -1
Popcorn Sutton Posted September 25, 2013 Author Posted September 25, 2013 I wrote the wrong code. It's actually unit = unit + prompt[0] prompt = prompt[1:] These are operations on strings. 0 means the first minimal unit of the string. While the unit is in knowledge, the bits of the string collide, but stay linear. When it's no longer in knowledge, the string ejects. The two ways you can detect an empty variable is either by prompting it or ejecting it. You can see this cognitively either when you fill a variable (with something like a snowman, and then a sunset behind it), or by ejecting it (like when you eliminate the snowman). Sorry if this is contentious, but as chomsky says, theres a dogma against studying these things and it seems unjustifiable, especially if we seek unification. -1
Recommended Posts