Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/AMSmath.js
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know the reaction below is E2 as I looked up the answer, but my question is why can it not be Sn1.

 

 

 

(1-bromocyclohexyl)benzene + CH3CH2O- ---EtOH-----> E2 rxn.

 

 

 

 

I realize Ethoxide Anion is a decent base, but as I was instructed Ethoxide has slightly higher nucelophlicity than basicity. I understand that the nucleophile is not part of the Sn1 rate law, but why would it not perform the reaction that involves ethoxide to be a nucelophile just because it can "act better as one" (so to speak).

 

Additionally, its tertiary, with a decent leaving group, and in a polar protic solvent---All suitable for Sn1. I just don't understand why Sn1 is not possible? Any input would be appreciated so I can straighten this is my head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.