A semi unified force theory

[skeptic1]

The reason this is called a semi unified force theory is because it eliminates the nuclear and gravitational forces then splits the electro-magnetic force into two forces, electric and magnetic.

The universe is made up of two things, matter which produces the electric force and energy which causes the magnetic force. Matter gives an object substance while energy gives it structure.

The natural state of matter is the neutron. The neutron is not a neutral particle but a subatomic molecule with both a negative and positive charge. The support for this hypothesis is that both the creation of the neutron and its decay into a proton, electron, and gamma ray are exothermic reactions which cannot be. If the neutron had both a positive and negative charge as it moved it would represent two currents going in opposite directions. If it were to move through a magnetic filed the two currents would be pushed in opposite directions providing the force to split the molecule and produce the gamma ray.

Energy is a thing not a different form of matter or the property of an object. It gives an object structure and produces a energy field which is evidenced by the magnetic field. The force between two magnetics is not equal to their product over the distance squared and the force of a magnet does not decrease as approximately the cube of the distance. The force between magnetic is equal to their sum divide by the distance between them. This distance is not measured from the center of one magnet to the center of the other magnet but from one magnet to the magnetic field of the other magnet. This can bee shown by doing an experiment. In the experiment a steel block with a magnet is placed on a scale. Over the magnet is suspended a brass threaded rod with another equal magnet and a steel washer screwed on. The attractive force between the three magnets (two permanent magnets and one induced magnet) is measured on the scale in grams. With the higher magnet fixed the steel washer is screwed down the rod approaching the base magnet. As it travels down the rod the force between the magnets does not change until it reaches the midpoint where the force increases. This means the strength of the induced magnet in the steel washer is decreasing linearly as it descends which means the force of the top magnet is decreasing linearly. When it reaches the midpoint it moves into the magnetic field of the base magnet and the force between the base magnet and washer increases decreasing the weight of the steel block. The distance between the magnetics is from one magnet to the magnetic field of the other magnet. The reason the force of a magnet appears to decrease as the approximate cube of the distance is that when you measure the strength of the magnet with a steel block the permanent magnet induces a magnet field in the steel block so you are measuring the force between two magnets. As the magnet gets closer to the block the induced magnet gets stronger and its magnetic field increase causing the distance between the two magnets to also shorten by more than the measured movement.

This shows that the strength of an energy field decrease according to distance and that the energy field of objects can add producing larger objects. The energy fields of atoms combine to form molecules. The energy field of these can then combine to form larger objects such as the earth or moon. The earth and moon fields combine to form the earth-moon unit which orbits to sun which has its own energy field which combines with other solar systems to form the galaxy. What we call gravity is really the actions of energy fields upon other objects. Gravity is not a force from mass but energy and when you use the centripetal and gravitational force to find the mass of a planet you are really finding the energy field of that unit. Jupiter is not a gas giant but a solid planet with lots of iron producing the red color and large magnetic field. This was shown when the comet fragments struck it producing plume consistent with a recoil of a solid hitting a solid rather than a solid penetrating a liquid or gas. The calculated mass of Jupiter is the energy of the Jupiter unit. The probes to mars and the moon show that they do not have the lighter density that the calculated mass gives but that they have a smaller energy field than the earth. (To see the argument for gravity being a function of energy got to the invisible post in physic forums general physics "alternative to the force of gravity")

The nuclear forces were created to counter the repelling electrical force of the protons in the nucleus. How much energy would it take to split an electron from a neutron in the nucleus and provided it with enough force to overcome the attractive force of all the protons in the nucleus and pass through the repelling force of the orbiting electrons? This would seem to be impossible but that fact that electrons are emitted from atom's nucleus gives the clue on how energy and matter combine to build objects. Energy is attracted to positive matter and repels negative matter. The force of energy is greater than the force of matter so energy is able to knock an electron off a neutron creating a hydrogen atom and acts as a confining force for the nucleus. There is no binding force. This is shown by the fact that an alpha particle with its two electrons in the middle of a four proton tetrahedron is stable even though the electrical forces would cause it to decay while a neutron which is more electrically stable is unstable when not hidden in a nucleus by protons. If there are too few neutrons or electrons in an atoms nucleus the atom is electrically unstable but if thee are too many neutrons or electrons the electron is exposed to the energy field causing the atom to split or eject an electron.

Energy fields and electrical fields combine to form units and these units act as the aether that transmits light, the disturbance in one transmitted to the neighboring units. There is no photon and the reason that light bends around a star is because the magnetic field is stronger causing the wave to go faster. This can be seen in a swimming pool where things under water appear closer or magnified because the light is traveling faster in the stronger magnetic field of the water. If you look at a lane divider in a pool with you eyes half in and out of the water the bottom half of the divider appears closer and larger. This also the reason for the red shift in the universe. The light is traveling into weaker and stronger magnetic fields which cause the length of the light waves to shorten or get longer. To see an explanation of the atom, light, chemical bonds and more go to my invisible you tube cite called "physicists are fools".

With this theory the sun burns backwards. It starts as a mass of neutrons with only electrical fields. Energy that is attracted to the positive electrical field and begins to convert neutrons into hydrogen atoms. In the proses it creates large atoms some of which are stable. These atoms are then expelled to the trash piles which are the planets and moons. Energy is not produced by the sun but attracted to the sun and the light that comes from the sun is disturbance in the fields produced as matter is converted to hydrogen. This solves one of the paradoxes of nuclear energy. Is it possible to split a hydrogen atom into two deuterium atoms and use the released binding energy to convert two deuterium atoms into helium releasing more energy?

Now that I've completed this invisible post I can abandon physics which makes both me and physicists happy.

 

[studiot]

 

The universe is made up of two things, matter which produces the electric force and energy which causes the magnetic force. Matter gives an object substance while energy gives it structure.

The natural state of matter is the neutron. The neutron is not a neutral particle but a subatomic molecule with both a negative and positive charge.

 

 

OOps

 

You seem to have contrdicted yourself within the first few lines.

 

Two things for the universe so where did charge come from - That's three things or is it four by my counting.

Edited September 28, 2013 by studiot

[Klaynos]

What falsifiable, numerical predictions does your idea make?