Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The question of the nonexistence of antimatter is one the open questions of current physics. The qualitative explanation has to do with nonconservation of parity under the weak force. However no one has worked out the details leading to the loss of anitmatter.

Posted

Note that if the universe was largely antimatter, rather than matter, then we would call that matter (and what we currently call matter would be antimatter). :)

Posted

Experts believe at the start there was a tiny bit more matter than antimatter, so when all the matter and antimatter cancelled out, there was only a tiny bit of matter left over, and that matter is all the matter in the observable universe.

Posted (edited)

Experts believe at the start there was a tiny bit more matter than antimatter, so when all the matter and antimatter cancelled out, there was only a tiny bit of matter left over, and that matter is all the matter in the observable universe.

Which would make sense in terms that there is only about 5% estimated total matter in the universe, the rest being made up of dark matter and energy.

 

-Arch

Edited by Archimedes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.