I believe that gravity is a push force caused by neutrinos.

 

At the point of the big bang there would of been three fundamental particles that would cause this. Many other particles doing other stuff.

 

Particle one. Neutrino. ( can travel through matter with little loss of energy )

 

Particle two. (probably hydrogen?) Neutrinos interact weakly with.

 

Particle three. Neutrinos interact completely with and can not pass through.

 

 

At the point of big bag there would have been trillions of neutrinos traveling through every square centimeter (in every direction )of space every second .

 

Any fundamental particle unable to let them pass through would have to absorb the total mass and energy off every one of the the trillions per second hitting it.

 

These particles would rapidly be pushed together by neutrinos. As the clumps of particle number three got bigger they would create a shadow for particle two and it to would start to be pushed to these growing clumps of matter.

 

 

Eventually there would be clumps of number three surrounded buy number two.

 

Number three particle can not interact in any way with number two so a kind of status quo would set up.

 

the large clump of number three particle would creating a complete neutrino shield in all directions .all matter is pushed towards it and is compressed to the point of fission .

 

As soon as these clumps spark up they produce there own neutrinos and nearly counteract the cosmic pushing neutrinos.

 

The cosmos would be held in a kind of suspended animation at that point.

 

 

Any way,

 

I have worked out an easy way to prove this wrong but have hit a google wall.

 

If neutrinos are behind gravity the tensor force tides would have a very particular shape. Especially when sun and moon line up.

 

I am asking if any one has info on tensor force tides.

 

Many thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reactors are a prodigious source of neutrinos. Gravity is unaffected by this.

Here's another flaw. The sun is also a very prodigious source of neutrinos, yet the earth and all the planets seem to be attracted to it instead of repelled.

Here's another flaw. The sun is also a very prodigious source of neutrinos, yet the earth and all the planets seem to be attracted to it instead of repelled.

Unless the Sun attracts neutrinos, which means we would need to add another pointless force into the mix.

Here's another flaw. The sun is also a very prodigious source of neutrinos, yet the earth and all the planets seem to be attracted to it instead of repelled.

Hi Bignose, I think there is a difference in the properties of high energy neutrinos and low energy neutrinos. As you know the sun produces mostly low energy neutrinos and the background super nova neutrinos are mostly high energy. Both seem to be 65 billion per second per square centimeter.

Your claims are lacking in any sort of detail. How many high-energy neutrinos are there out there? What source, and how concentrated by the time they get here? How can the force be radial to the sun, given the distribution of matter out there?

 

You have presented no data, nor any viable model. It's a handwave; it doesn't even rise to the level of a bad guess if you have any awareness of physics and astronomy. Why would a body that is twice as far away feel only 1/4 of the pushing force if it's a pushing force? How can there be a directional pushing force when we keep changing orientation wrt the sun? Why doesn't the sun get pushed away from us?