Ankit Gupta Posted November 25, 2013 Posted November 25, 2013 Why do two photons never collide I mean when two light rays intersect each other they do not form any resultant just passes each by ? Why and how ?
Sensei Posted November 25, 2013 Posted November 25, 2013 They do. But you need to have gamma photons with f.e. 510,999 eV energy each. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-photon_physics Result is matter production http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation y + y -> e+ + e-
Ankit Gupta Posted November 25, 2013 Author Posted November 25, 2013 OK but why do not simple photons of visible spectrum collide ?
ajb Posted November 25, 2013 Posted November 25, 2013 As photons are not electrically charged they are not going to directly interact with each other.
Enthalpy Posted November 26, 2013 Posted November 26, 2013 I have not heard of two photons creating an electron-positron pair. Only one single photon carrying two electron mass at least, and near a heavy nucleus. This is also what the Wiki article seems to suggest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production#Energy Though, as the annihilation of an electron-positron pair must be reversible, maybe the process with two photons can exist. Could it be that the creation of a pair requires too much accuracy from the photons? Fun, this would resemble entropy, but with few particles. --------------------------------- Apart from carrying no charge, photons are also bosons, which permits them to occupy the same state. Electrons couldn't, for being fermions.
hoola Posted December 8, 2013 Posted December 8, 2013 I thought I read that photons were their own anti-particle...and that they usually don't interact as they carry no charge and seldom get close enough to interact, but if they do happen to collide, they anniliate into heat....edd
Enthalpy Posted December 8, 2013 Posted December 8, 2013 What shall mean "heat" for two particles becoming none? What do you call "close enough" for photons? The ones we receive from distant stars are square light years wide. More generally: why formulate wild assumptions as claims?
swansont Posted December 9, 2013 Posted December 9, 2013 "annihilate into heat" makes no sense. Heat isn't a substance, it's a process.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now