New train-embankment

[whatifitaint]

For whatever reason, this post is causing me to be accused of being someone I am not etc. However, in different forums a correct answer was not given to this problem. Also, I am not sure if this forum allows questions like this to be asked. If not, just remove it and this is fine.

 

Anyway here it is.

 

This is a modification to the train-embankment experiment. I am hoping someone can solve this problem.

Assume when M and M' are co-located, lightning strikes their common location. There is also an observer B' in the negative direction of M’.

After some time elapses in each frame, B' and M become co-located.

Considering only the negative and positive x directions, the goal is to determine all of the special relativity truths for the lightning light beams at the instant M and B' are co-located.

1) The light beams are equidistant from M in the M frame. So, label these locations as (d,0,0) and (-d,0,0).
2) The light beams are equidistant from M’ in the M’ frame. So, label these as (d’,0,0) and (-d’,0,0)

To make it simple, label the common frame event of B’ and M being co-located as P. So, P is true if and only if B’ and M are co-located. Below are additional truths.

3) If P is true in M, then P is true in M’.
4) If P is true in M’, then P is true in M.
5) Therefore, if P is false in M’ then P is false in M.
6) Also, if P is false in M then P is false in M’.

Do the lorentz transforms work consistently under these assumptions?

[xyzt]

 

 

 

Do the lorentz transforms work consistently under these assumptions?

 

Yes, the Lorentz transforms work.

Yes, you just got banned for the same exact type of ant-mainstream trolling on the ScienceForums, chinglu. Why do you feel compelled to spam all the physics forums with this type of garbage?

 

 

Edited November 27, 2013 by xyzt

[whatifitaint]

 

 

 

 

Yes, the Lorentz transforms work.

Yes, you just got banned for the same exact type of ant-mainstream trolling on the ScienceForums, chinglu. Why do you feel compelled to spam all the physics forums with this type of garbage?

 

 

You are a liar. I was banned for being accused of a sock puppet of chinglu.

 

It looks like chinglu is inside of everyone's head. He/her is not in mine.

 

But, since this is science, why not show specifically how the Lorentz transforms work.

 

See how whatever I say does not matter when you are right?

 

 

Edited November 28, 2013 by whatifitaint

[hypervalent_iodine]

!

Moderator Note

We don't ban or reprimand people because of their history on other forums, so there is no need to bring it up.

[whatifitaint]

!

Moderator Note

We don't ban or reprimand people because of their history on other forums, so there is no need to bring it up.

Thank you so much.

 

 

I really cannot get the answer and as of yet, it has not been provided.

 

When provided correctly, then I am done with this question.

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

 

We do ban sockpuppets, though.

 

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/29763-bannedsuspended-users/?p=779812