Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

when photon splits into positron and electron .the pair produced is expected to be associated with gravitational field which indicates that in addition to electromagnetic field photon is also carrier of gravitational field

Posted

Photons exert gravity but are not carriers of the gravitational field. This is easily demonstrated, as one can shield photons and electromagnetic interactions but not gravity.

Posted

Energy, including photons, creates gravitation as well. The conservation of rest mass +energy implies that the resulting gravitation field doesn't change by the event.

 

Swansont, apologies for paraphrasing you.

Posted

if photon is associated with gravity it leads to the conclusion that photon is hybrid of two types of highly unstable particles where one is associated with pure electromagnetic field while other is carrier of pure gravity. The particles are named by me as electromagnaton and mattenergon.These particles exist in combined state only.Considering the novel nature of photon the properties of photon can be easily understood and photon is no longer an enigma as it once was was to Einstern

Posted

Good post and answers. Thanks

Photons exert gravity but are not carriers of the gravitational field. This is easily demonstrated, as one can shield photons and electromagnetic interactions but not gravity.

Look for photoelectric effect. The electromagnetism and charge is the key, great post

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

dS/dA=0

 

David Hilbert solved the vacuum solution of general relativity.

 

I haven't bothered to solve for spatial curvature due to electromagnetism. However Hilbert points the way.

 

Over all possible 4-volumes of spacetime [math]\int F^*F[/math] is minimal in vacuum with respect to the electromagnetic vector potential.

 

F is the Faraday tensor with lower indices. *F is the Hodge dual of the Faraday tensor. (^), is the wedge product operator--reference Grassmann algebra and the exterior calculus.

 

The result is an untested conclusion of general relativity.

 

I don't know what "carrier of gravitational field" means.

Edited by decraig
Posted

[latex]\int F \wedge * F[/latex]

 

Your latex is a bit wonky - you didn't have a wedge operator in your expression; it's \wedge btw

Posted

I haven't bothered to solve for spatial curvature due to electromagnetism.

We have Einstein-Maxwell theory and there are classes of exact solutions here as well as numerical solutions that have been found. I have no idea about the experimental verification of this theory as for the most part we can comfortably consider EM on a curved background in astrophysics.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.