Just Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 The universe we live in determines how many dimensions we exist in. If we live in a ten dimensional universe, we must be 10 dimensional beings. However, the length we would extend into the higher dimensions would be minimal. For example, a 2 dimensional creature residing in a 3 dimensional universe would have a length, width, and if you looked closely a small height. It would be similar to a piece of paper. The length and width of the paper are easily measurable, while the height would be extremely small and not easily measurable. If the paper had only a length, width, and no height, it would not exist in a 3 dimensional universe. Therefore, if we live in a universe with 10 spatial dimensions, we must be 10 dimensional beings.
Lightmeow Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 This has holes in it. String Theory says that we might be on a D-Brane, a place in space that is limited to 3 +1 dimensional universe. There for, we would be a four dimensional universe. It's going to be hell for scientists to try to prove String Theory, or M-Theory(11 dimensions instead of one). I am a strong believer in it though. Some of the things I don't understand though, like all of the other dimensions(I get up to dimension 6, then it goes over my head) You should read up more. A two dimensional creature would not have height, if it did, it would be a three dimensional creature. I think the two, one, and zero dimensions are very abstract concepts though. I can't think about something with no height.
Bill Angel Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 The universe we live in determines how many dimensions we exist on. If we live in a ten dimensional universe, we must be 10 dimensional beings. However, the length we would extend into the higher dimensions would be minimal. For example, a 2 dimensional creature residing in a 3 dimensional universe would have a length, width, and if you looked closely a small height. It would be similar to a piece of paper. The length and width of the paper are easily measurable, while the height would be extremely small and not easily measurable. If the paper had only a length, width, and no height, it would not exist in a 3 dimensional universe. If you have not already read it, you should check out the book "Flatland: a romance in many dimensions" by Edwin Abbot. (1884) The author of this work also considers as you have what it would be like to live as a two dimensional creature, but in his scenario in a two dimensional universe.
Dekan Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 (edited) Theories come and go, but they all seem to like big numbers, thus: In the 16th Century - the Universe revolves around the Earth in 38 or 47 Epicycles. In the 21st Century - the Universe has 10 or 11 Dimensions Isn't it "plus ca change" - always the lure of imaginary big numbers in the theories! What's wrong with a straightforward 3-D Universe. As Just points out in post #1, if the Universe were 10-D, then humans, as components of the Universe, would also have 10 dimensions. Yet do we ever experience any more dimensions than 3. No - so doesn't that mean only 3 dimensions actually exist . And 10-D is just an imaginary idea, like the square-root of minus 1? Edited December 6, 2013 by Dekan
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now