Comparison of Hydrogen Balmer Data to EM Kerr Hydrogen Model

[sb635]

Here is the abstract to a paper I wrote:

Non-Euclidean Electromagnetic Kerr Model for Hydrogen

Abstract
A Balmer series of observed hydrogen data was compared to two geometric levels of atomic theory and modeling. The first theory compared was the Euclidean based (Minkowski metric) special relativistic Dirac theory, with QED corrections added. The second theory applied was a non Euclidean electromagnetic (EM) Kerr field theory with Euclidean QED corrections added. Each model was used to predict the Balmer series transition wavelengths, and then compared to the observed wavelength data. The statistics (sample averages, standard deviations) for the model performances were computed, and show a noticeable increase in accuracy and precision of the model predictions using the non Euclidean EM Kerr field theory with QED, compared to Euclidean Dirac theory with QED. These results suggest Euclidean Dirac theory is too restrictive because of its special geometric nature, and does not incorporate an important “beyond special/non Euclidean” relativistic contributor. According to non Euclidean field theory, the time dilation the electron experiences is a function of not only its velocity (as in Dirac theory), but the electron’s time dilation is also a function of its position in the “generalized” electromagnetic Kerr field of the hydrogen atom. The time dilation the electron experiences is then stronger than in Dirac special relativity, and increases subshell energies. This causes a “compression” of the probabilistic hydrogen subshells towards the proton (on average), even more so than the introduction of special relativity. The modeling of these added non-Euclidean relativistic effects produces predictions in better agreement with the observed hydrogen Balmer data.

The paper can be found at:

http://sb635.qwestoffice.net/sci_forum_post4.pdf

I hope relativity theorists find the idea and theory interesting. The results suggest modern QED has missed modeling an important contributor to atomic time dilation. The better fit of the EM Kerr model suggests the electron's time dilation in hydrogen is not just a function of its velocity, as in Euclidean Dirac + QED theory, but the electron's time dilation is also a function of its position (radius) in a generalized EM atomic-sized Kerr field, which includes "magnetism," that is, "frame dragging." The theory and modeling strongly suggest a simple route to the unification of both "magnetisms" in nature, both gravito- and electro-.

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

 

You already have a thread on this

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/79136-comparison-of-atomic-theories-to-hydrogen-balmer-data/

 

One thread per discussion, please