wlad Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 Dr. John Arrington is a reseacher physicist of the Argonne National Laboratory. I had many discussions with Dr. Arrington in the blog Journal of Nuclear Physics, by Andrea Rossi. In the Rossi's blog, Dr. Arrington uses the fake name JR. In our discussion, I defend the viewpoint that current nuclear models are wrong, while Dr. Arrington tries to show that there is nothing wrong with the nuclear models. My last question do Dr. Arrington was the following: Dear Mr. JR Concerning the z-axis within the nuclei, it is written in the page 133 of my book Quantum Ring Theory, published in 2006:—————————————————-1. The distribution about the z-axis is a nuclear property up to now unknown in Nuclear Physics—————————————————-See oage 133:http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-52178100-1386630652.jpg In May-2013 the Professor Peter Butler of the University of Liverpool had proposed that nucleons (protons and neutrons) are distributed within the nuclei around a z-axis:http://news.liv.ac.uk/2013/05/09/scientists-demonstrate-pear-shaped-atomic-nuclei/ However from the current nuclear models an even-even nucleus as 224Ra cannot be pear shaped. That’s why some theorists are thinking about the existence of a 5th force. Because as there is no way to justify the existence of the z-axis by considering the Heisenberg’s phantasmagoric method applied to Nuclear Theory, they are trying to justify the different distribution of protons and neutrons about the z-axis by considering a new physical cause within the nuclei, missing in the current nuclear models.So, they are supposing that such physical cause perhaps is the 5th force. Dear Mr. JR,as you claim that there is nothing wrong with the Standard Nuclear Physics, and therefore nothing is missing in the current nuclear models, then why the existence of the z-axis had not been predicted in Nuclear Physics before 2013 ??? regardswlad
swansont Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 ! Moderator Note You already have a thread closed for using it to air grievances you had. It's not an acceptable avenue of discussion. Don't do it again.
Recommended Posts