Popcorn Sutton Posted December 23, 2013 Posted December 23, 2013 I used to believe that nothing was impossible, but then I thought that nothing can possibly occur more than the current point of interest. Maybe something could occur the same exact amount, but never more.
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted December 23, 2013 Posted December 23, 2013 (edited) I used to believe that nothing was impossible, but then I thought that nothing can possibly occur more than the current point of interest. Maybe something could occur the same exact amount, but never more. What ? Quite ? are you trying to say ? If I were a computer scientist, or someone who always converts things into a maths formula when they can .Well ? I might try and write it down as a mathematical formula. It seems that's what everybody wants now er days. Humbug ! Edited December 23, 2013 by Mike Smith Cosmos
Popcorn Sutton Posted December 24, 2013 Author Posted December 24, 2013 I wrote this down really quick before I fell asleep. It seems like I have insights right before then and I just want to write them and share them. What I mean is that from this whole perspective I have of the world as information, if you're making the brain (or the world) computational, nothing can occur more than the point of interest at any given point in time for any given observer. By the point of interest, I mean whatever you're focused on, in a quantum sense, occurs more than anything else because that is how it maintains your focus. It's like this- Poi = ball World = ballgrassballtreeballskyballhouseballgateballnet Something like that
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted December 24, 2013 Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) I wrote this down really quick before I fell asleep. It seems like I have insights right before then and I just want to write them and share them. You might be pleased to know that what is happening , just before you sleep is subject to some recent new brain research see " the brain default network" by Solokoff at the university of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia according to Douglas Fox ( ref 'Nothing' New Scientist Isbn 978-1846685187 Secret life of the brain Page 16- 25 ) Mike Edited December 24, 2013 by Mike Smith Cosmos
Popcorn Sutton Posted December 24, 2013 Author Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) I know that my brain is technically me, but sometimes I wonder about it. How many people actually can relate with me? Does what I'm saying make sense? Could I get published for my thoughts? Are they useful? Is my mind unique or is it normal? Is it common for someone to be as obsessed about science as I am? Did I invent a new framework or did it exist prior to me? Have I sparked interest in others? Am I a punk? Is my tendency to be impulsive disturbing? Will I get recognition for my theories? Will I be like Noam Chomsky one day or will I be a good for nothing loser? Am I going to move to Mexico? Thailand? The Philippines? Am I going to be a politician? Am I influential politically? Philosophically? Is my brain useful? I have so many questions about myself that I wish others could answer for me, but I'm not sure if anyone will be able to. Feel free to move this topic or this post itself to the lounge. Sorry if it was a hindrance that I posted it here. PS. Mike that's the first time I've seen you make reference like that. Bravo! Edited December 24, 2013 by Popcorn Sutton
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now