ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 the thing weird about the periodic table is the gradual change along a period and the sudden change back to the start. there is something or some barrier here.
Strange Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 the thing weird about the periodic table is the gradual change along a period and the sudden change back to the start. Isn't that what "periodic" means?
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 (edited) momentum is not newton. momentum is descartes, pronounced 'deskartez'. newton has no concept. he was royal mint secretary. Edited January 4, 2014 by ASG
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 no. periodic means the same thing again and again. no increases or breaks or change.
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 that's because i've decided to prolong the heat so that i can have a war that finishes all wars.
michel123456 Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 Isn't that what "periodic" means? Surprisingly there is still people today (in 2013) interested in the questions you don't have and building models. Look here. I am fascinated. http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?Button=post-2000+Formulations
michel123456 Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 that's because i've decided to prolong the heat so that i can have a war that finishes all wars. ? Hi ASG. It wouldn'be a bad idea to introduce yourself here in this other thread. That would maybe help us understand the meaning of this post of yours. I say maybe...
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 adhering to given rule at all times. can be a silly tactic. breaking an enemy can be done in many ways. logic or mythology. left and right. how are you? are you good? lol.
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 negative PE is lost PE for the body being studied. there is no negative anything. negative is subtraction.
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 what good would that do. the words are in english, you are smart people, you'll figure it out.
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 why are you fascinated. those are as good as mendeleyev. they just don't have his lovely beard.
studiot Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 no. periodic means the same thing again and again. no increases or breaks or change. Think again.
michel123456 Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 (edited) what good would that do. the words are in english, you are smart people, you'll figure it out. You don't want to know what I figure. Edited January 4, 2014 by michel123456
swansont Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 negative PE is lost PE for the body being studied. there is no negative anything. negative is subtraction. Um, no.
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 (edited) proceed with your negative argument. i know where you come from and i know where you are going, so UMM, go on. Edited January 4, 2014 by ASG
Strange Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 momentum is not newton. momentum is descartes, pronounced 'deskartez'. newton has no concept. he was royal mint secretary. Newton had the concepts behind the laws of motion, the universal law of gravitation, calculus, optics, and many other things. He was not just the secretary of the Royal Mint. And it is pronounced "decart": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes
Strange Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 no. periodic means the same thing again and again. no increases or breaks or change. Apparently not: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/periodic
ASG Posted January 4, 2014 Author Posted January 4, 2014 no. motion is galileo. calculus is a summation operator known to all,limits is ratio work, gravitation is false and optics is heavily borrowed from the arabs. he is probably Just a secretary. i am allowing the lens equation for his services as secretary. it is descartez. nibbling the end is modern.
Strange Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 you bring a dictionary to a science class. Why not? I didn't just want to give my own, unsupported definition. Do you have a source for your definition?
ASG1699 Posted January 4, 2014 Posted January 4, 2014 no he did not. he had no ideas of his own. and it is dezcartez, nibbling the end is modern.
Recommended Posts