Dekan Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) I'd be grateful for advice and guidance on this question please. Given - that in 1984, London ("chief city of Airstrip One") is being subjected to a sustained bombardment by rocket-bombs, and: 1. The rocket-bombs are falling at the rate of 20 to 30 a week (say, 4 each day); 2. Each bomb destroys buildings within a 50-metre radius of the impact-point; 3. No rebuilding is undertaken; 4. London has an area of 40 x 40 kilometres, ie 1,600 square kilometres; Then - is it possible to calculate how long it would take for London to be completely destroyed? The difficulties in such a calculation seem to be as follows: A. As the bombardment goes on, there's an increasing probability that incoming bombs will land in the already destroyed area. Eg, when 50% of London has been destroyed, 50% of newly-arriving bombs will land in this destroyed area, and so do no more than "convulse the rubble". B. There's an infinite degree of "overlap" between the impact-points of successive bombs. Ie, a new bomb might land right on the dead centre of a previous detonation, or 1 metre from it, or 5 metres from it, or 10 metres.... and so on. I raised this question many years ago, on another science forum, and was told that because of factors A and B above, no exact mathematical calculation can be made. Granted that this is so, is it at least possible to make a kind of "statistical"prediction - on the lines of "after x number of years, there's a 99% probability that London will be 99% destroyed "? This question has nagged at my mind ever since first reading the book (which was before the actual year 1984!) Any advice will be very much appreciated - thanks! Edited February 17, 2014 by Dekan
Bignose Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 There probably isn't a nice closed functional form that would describe the situation, but a Monte Carlo simulation of the scenario could be run many 1000s of times and give a pretty decent idea of the average devastation v. time curve. Run it a bunch more and you can probably even build decent estimates of the confidence intervals, too.
mathematic Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 If you are looking for an average after n bombs, there is a straightforward approach. Let x be the fraction of the area affected by one bomb. The first bomb destroys x, the second bomb destroys (on average) x(1-x), the nth bomb destroys (on average) x(1-x)^n-1. Add all this up to get 1-(1-x)^n destroyed (on average) after n bombs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now