swansont Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 It's a cryptic diagram with no explanation. Without context it's meaningless. 3
Delta1212 Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 Are you saying that photons eventually turn into neutrons? And what is the speed of life?
Ophiolite Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 It looks incomplete, incomprehensible, inconsistent, incidental and incalculable. It must be the new in thing.
Greg H. Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 It's a cryptic diagram with no explanation. Without context it's meaningless. Pretty much this. Can you perhaps explain what this is supposed to illustrate and why any of us should care?
John Cuthber Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 It's a cryptic diagram with no explanation. Without context it's meaningless. I suspect that adding context won't help.
swansont Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 I suspect that adding context won't help. As do I, we won't know for sure until it's given.
Endercreeper01 Posted February 20, 2014 Posted February 20, 2014 I suspect this is a theory. If it is, it needs to have math, or else it is not a theory.
sheever Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 here is some lift for you Swansont.Mononeutron: Isolated neutrons undergo beta decay with a mean lifetime of approximately 15 minutes (half-life of approximately 10 minutes), becoming protons (the nucleus of hydrogen), electrons and antineutrinos.would you like me to to explain the opposite cycle as well?
Sensei Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 Sheever, read about nuclear fusion.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
swansont Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 I did.whats your point? What's yours? You didn't start the thread, so how is it you have insight into the OP? (BTW, I am familiar with neutron decay, thank you)
sheever Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 (edited) Although alpha, beta, and gamma radiations were most commonly found, other types of decay were eventually discovered. Shortly after the discovery of the positron in cosmic ray products, it was realized that the same process that operates in classical beta decay can also produce positrons (positron emission) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay Antimatter plasmas and antihydrogen http://ttf2009.ucsd.edu/research/surkogroup/positron/papers/sr6.pdf happy for you Swansont. altough the thread starter post can be mistunderstood it has some point and sense to put under consideration. You keep buggering me mate I have right to reply and my post is relate to the thread Edited February 23, 2014 by sheever
Sensei Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 (edited) I did.whats your point? You wanted opposite cycle to neutron decay, so I gave it to you.. In the middle of link you should see (if you read it carefully): D+ + T+ -> He-4 + 3.5 MeV + n0 + 14.1 MeV That's how free neutron can be produced. One of dozen possible options. Edited February 23, 2014 by Sensei
sheever Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 (edited) You wanted opposite cycle to neutron decay, so I gave it to you.. In the middle of link you should see (if you read it carefully): D+ + T+ -> He-4 + 3.5 MeV + n0 + 14.1 MeV That's how free neutron can be produced. One of dozen possible options. I see thanks for that ,yes i made a research on that. Edited February 23, 2014 by sheever
swansont Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 ! Moderator Note From rule 2.7 Videos and pictures should be accompanied by enough text to set the tone for the discussion, and should not be posted alone. Since you did not post any of the context that was requested and this is expressly against the rules, the thread is locked. If you can muster up a paragraph or two of explanation you may open a new thread, but further pictures in violation of this rule will be considered spamming and you will be treated accordingly.
Recommended Posts