Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My guess is that with no matter, there would be no space-time. But maybe there would be a kind of space that is not space-time. For time to exist, there must be matter.

Posted

My guess is that with no matter at all no one would care. Locally matter-less regions are called vacuum, and generally considered as being part of space, implying that space exists in these regions(*).

 

(*) But of course the very term "region" implies space, so the statement is circular reasoning to some extend.

Posted (edited)

@Hashirama_Senju :

You have re-discovered what Einstein called "Mach's Principle." It's actually more of Einstein than of Ernst Mach, but Mach did revive a really old gedankenexperiment called "Newton's Bucket" to argue it.

 

Interesting stuff. I've given you some search terms in the above paragraph that will lead you interesting places. If you need help with your search-fu, let me know; I will provide terms happily. You will also find a good discussion of Mach's Principle in Brian Greene's book, The Fabric of the Cosmos, which I highly recommend. I can look up the chapter if you like. It's actually a pretty direct proof of the Equivalence Principle.

Edited by Schneibster

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.