Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Im Using a Cas Calculator to work out the Following Equation

x+11 2(x+14x)
------- = ---------
3 9

Now i no the Answer is -5 but when putting the following Equation in my Calculator i keep comimg up with


11
x= ----
9


Just looking for a bit of Help if any one can help me at all.. thanks Matt

Posted

Textbooks often contain typos. You should solve the equation by hand and see what you find.

 

At the very least, try plugging in -5 and then 11/9, as hypervalent_iodine did, and see which value results in a true statement.

Posted

I also got 11/9.

 

(x+11)/3=2(x+14x)/9

 

(x+11)/3=2(15x)/9

 

(11/9+11)/3=2(15(11/9))/9

 

(11/9+99/9)/3=2(55/3)/9

 

110/9/3 = 110/3/9

 

110/27 = 110/27

Posted

Hang on Hang on. What sort of text book writes 30x as 2(x+14x)?!

 

I would bet a pound to a penny that it is not the answer which is wrong but the equation - either in the printing of the text or in the transcription

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14x)}{9}[/latex]

 

is awful similar to

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14)}{9}[/latex]

 

which is a much more normal way of writing things

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14)}{9} [/latex]

 

[latex]\frac{9(x+11)}{3}=2(x+14) [/latex]

 

[latex]3(x+11) = 2(x+14)[/latex]

 

[latex]3x +33 = 2x +28[/latex]

 

[latex]3x-2x = 28-33[/latex]

 

[latex]x = -5[/latex]

Posted

Hang on Hang on. What sort of text book writes 30x as 2(x+14x)?!

 

I would bet a pound to a penny that it is not the answer which is wrong but the equation - either in the printing of the text or in the transcription

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14x)}{9}[/latex]

 

is awful similar to

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14)}{9}[/latex]

 

which is a much more normal way of writing things

 

[latex]\frac{x+11}{3}=\frac{2(x+14)}{9} [/latex]

 

[latex]\frac{9(x+11)}{3}=2(x+14) [/latex]

 

[latex]3(x+11) = 2(x+14)[/latex]

 

[latex]3x +33 = 2x +28[/latex]

 

[latex]3x-2x = 28-33[/latex]

 

[latex]x = -5[/latex]

I was originally thinking that the book was going into simplification(combining like terms) because it was weird how a textbook would present the equation as such. Good eye, I must say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.