Jump to content

I am driving my car at the speed of light and I turn on my headlights. What do I see?


Iwikefactz

Recommended Posts

You can explore the situation in both reference frames (stationary observer and moving flashlight) here:

 

http://www.refsmmat.com/jsphys/relativity/relativity.html#flashlight

 

In short: you always see the light traveling away from you at the speed of light.

 

(Of course, you can't drive your car at the speed of light--only infinitely close to it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am driving my car at the speed of light and I turn on my headlights. What do I see?

;)

 

Have you driven a car and turned on your headlights? What did you see?

 

Relative to some inertial frames you were almost at lightspeed, but at light speed in none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on now...

 

The speed of light is measured to be c in any valid frame.

To be able to move at light-speed you and your car need to be massless.

There is no valid frame for any massless particle or object.

 

A conundrum !

(always wanted to use that word)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I am driving my car at the speed of light and I turn on my headlights. What do I see?

;)

 

Probably light from the headlights and stuff it reflects from. Remember to look in the rear view mirror though. Drive safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

With respect should that not be infinitesimally close, infinitely distant?

 

Yes. :D

 

However in the Cap'n's defense, it's a mistake we all make. And it does take infinite energy, so "infinitely close to the speed of light" makes colloquial sense, if not precise pedantic fussy accuracy.

 

(Sorry, Cap'n, I assumed it was my mistake. I wasn't trying to be funny at your expense but at my own.)

Edited by Schneibster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you are almost treking along at the speed of light, you yourself would experience the roasting of a lifetime but the headlights would work.

a non-speedy observer would never get to see you roast.

 

at the impossible speed of light, you would not be able to ever get around to turning on the lights. however, if the lights were already on, i would imagine Cerenkov radiation might be observable to said non-speedy observer in some way or fashion.

of course this is just speculation.

 

come to think of it i would guess at this "sonic boom" in both scenarios.

Edited by davidivad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on now...

 

The speed of light is measured to be c in any valid frame.

To be able to move at light-speed you and your car need to be massless.

There is no valid frame for any massless particle or object.

 

A conundrum !

(always wanted to use that word)

Does that mean no mass or no mass? I mean, if he uses a speculative anti-gravity device, does that help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.