Moontanman Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 This subject is personally quite interesting to me, I keep or have kept many marine aquariums over the years and Sea Anemones are one of my passions. I had one for several years that was a meter across. I was one of the first people to explore the importance of photosynthesis in regards to Sea Anemones in the marine aquarium hobby, I used a 1000 watt metal halide light to grow that anemone to a meter across. The fact that they are half plant is surprising but their ancient roots are not. They can be extremely beautiful creatures and their interactions with symbiotic fishes, shrimps, and crabs is extremely interesting... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140318113816.htm 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 Sorry to say, but the article is badly misrepresenting the results. Far from inferring taxonomic distinctions, the paper is showing that they do possess regulatory mechanisms (specifically their post-transcriptional regulation of mRNA) that are similar to those of plants. However this does not change in any way that they are cnidaria and firmly belong to the kingdom of animalia. They are nowhere near half plant. In fact the article does point these things out but for some weird reasons draw completely false conclusions and put that into the title. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted March 20, 2014 Author Share Posted March 20, 2014 I didn't catch that but anemones are indeed a passion of mine and they are among the most interesting aquarium animals I know of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 They are interesting, no doubt. I just wished that science journalist would try to stick to facts instead of resorting to hyperbole, if they are not familiar with the subject. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadn737 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 They are interesting, no doubt. I just wished that science journalist would try to stick to facts instead of resorting to hyperbole, if they are not familiar with the subject. WHAT!?! A science journalist who accurately reports the facts? Do such people exist? I hated this story so very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts