Finalshine Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 If a black hole is of infinite density but Zero diameter does that make it a 2 dimensional or a 1 dimensional Object Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 You mean the singularity, right. For the Schwarzschild black hole the singularity is just a point, that is zero dimensional. If the black hole is rotating, then the singularity gets stretched out into a ring. However, technically the volume of such regions is zero! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enthalpy Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 How common could a point black hole be? I thought for every black hole detected, the horizon has a size, like planet-sized for a stellar black hole, and much bigger for a galactic black hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 For a solar mass black hole, the radius is about 3km. The radius is directly proportional to mass, so you can get an idea from that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MigL Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 (edited) The event horizon and ( possible ) singularity are different Enthalpy. The much larger horizon 'cloaks' the singularity from the rest of the universe. As far as I know naked singularities are a no-no, and primordial microscopic horizon ( small mass ) black holes should have evaporated long ago due to Hawking radiation. But who knows, we may be able to create microscopic black holes using a large enough accelerator. The LHC is obviously too small. Edited March 22, 2014 by MigL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 How common could a point black hole be? I thought for every black hole detected, the horizon has a size, like planet-sized for a stellar black hole, and much bigger for a galactic black hole. The opening statement about the zero diameter made me think the question is about the point-like singularity at the centre of a non-rotating black hole, as classically described by general relativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now