Function Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) Hello everyone In class, we saw some stuff in probability and I wondered if they could also be written with these symbols: [math]P(A \; \text{and}\; B)=P(A\cap B)[/math] [math]P(A \; \text{or}\; B)=P(A\cup B)[/math] And so I also wondered if they could also be written with proposition logic symbols [math]P(A\wedge B)[/math] and [math]P(A\vee B)[/math] For the chance of 'not A', we saw this notation: [math]P(\bar{A})[/math], but I wonder if this: [math]P(\neg A)[/math] is also good, and which one is the 'best' (best known, most correct one). Thanks. F Edited March 31, 2014 by Function
John Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) What we have is a set of potential outcomes of an experiment (the "sample space"), which we'll denote with Ω, and individual outcomes are subsets of the sample space. In addition, we have a function P : Ω → [0,1] assigning a probability to each outcome. So when we say P(A ∪ B), we're talking about a union of subsets being assigned a probability. The propositional logic symbols don't entirely make sense in this context. I suppose you could have a situation where you're randomly generating strings of logical symbols along with the two statements A and B, in which case the string "A ∧ B" would be one potential output. But of course, that's not the meaning you're asking about. Edit: I should note, as always, that notation isn't sacred. You could use P(A ∧ B) to denote the probability of two events A and B both happening. But it'd be a little strange. Edited March 31, 2014 by John 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now