lisab Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Considering that both analytical methods should be accurate to within 1% for the major component, do the results of the two methods agree? Explain in two sentences or less. If they do not agree, give a plausible explanation. my GC results Fraction 1 = 92.7% EtOAc 7.29% 1-BuOH Fraction 2 = 58.6% EtOAc 41.4% 1-BuOH Fraction 3 = 3.76% EtOAc 96.2% 1-BuOH RI results Fraction 1 = 87.5% EtOAc 12.5% 1-BuOH Fraction 2 = 49.5% EtOAc 50.5% 1-BuOH Fraction 3 = 2.5% EtOAc 97.5% 1-BuOH
hypervalent_iodine Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 As with your other thread, please show what you have done and where you are having trouble.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now