Function Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 (edited) Hello I'm trying to get a hang of oxidoreduction reactions, and stumbled upon this one; the question is to fill in the coefficients: [math]\text{Cu}+\text{HNO}_3\rightarrow\text{Cu}^{2+}+\text{NO}_2[/math] After doing what we saw in class, I reformed it to this: [math]\text{Cu}+2\text{HNO}_3+2\text{H}^+\rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2+2\text{H}_2\text{O}+\text{Cu}^{2+}[/math] I know that [math]\text{H}_2\text{O}[/math] can be formed as an 'extra' (which has been used to make the O's equal on both sides), but is the same true for [math]\text{H}^+[/math] ? Is it just like water a 'rest'? Same for this exercise: [math]\text{K}_2\text{Cr}_2\text{O}_7+\text{NaNO}_2\rightarrow\text{NaNO}_3+\text{Cr}^{3+}[/math] Trying to solve this one results in: [math]\text{K}_2\text{Cr}_2\text{O}_7+3\text{NaNO}_2+8\text{H}^+\rightarrow\text{Cr}^{3+}+3\text{NaNO}_3+4\text{H}_2\text{O}+2\text{K}^+[/math] Here, there's a rest of water, H+ and K+. Normal? Can I just leave them there? Thanks! Function Edited May 13, 2014 by Function
studiot Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 Are you studying the method of redox half reactions? These are balanced by adding electrons. Some multiples of two half reactions are added to create a full chemical reaction equation and the electrons cancel out. http://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/redox/equations.html
Function Posted May 13, 2014 Author Posted May 13, 2014 Are you studying the method of redox half reactions? These are balanced by adding electrons. Some multiples of two half reactions are added to create a full chemical reaction equation and the electrons cancel out. http://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/redox/equations.html Why, yes, we're using half reactions. So I can just leave the K+, H+, H2O?
Function Posted May 14, 2014 Author Posted May 14, 2014 (edited) Cu + 4HNO3 = Cu(NO3)2 + 2H2O + 2NO2 But that's a pretty different formula? We were just told to fill in the coefficients in the formula that was given to us. I will post my method later today. -- Edit: see attachment. Is it right? Edited May 14, 2014 by Function
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now