The Origin of The Universe From the Big Bang? The Space Reveals Everything?

[Nicholas Kang]

I am going to discuss something about space in this topic. Where does the universe came about? What causes Big Bang? I think we might have found out the answer. It all lies in a brand new theory (more precisely just a hypothesis) -The Theory of Space.

 

The Theory of Space

1. Space is everything. Nothing is outside space.

2. Space creates universe. No matter what theory might be proposed in the future, they must have relationship or originated from space itself.

3. Space is an ultimate invisible super large field, containing a vast amount of gravitions or gravitational field lines.

4. The 4 fundamental forces we know today are actually part of the gravitational field lines or gravitions. Under high temperature and pressure, the quantum of all forces will merge(not proven mathematically, just merely a hypothesis) and form the "real" gravitational force, which means the gravitational force we know today is just a remnant of a once unknown explosion or process. The gravitational force splits into 3 forces (strong, weak and electromagnetic) and some remnant(the weak gravitational force is measureable today)

5. Space expands beyond the speed of light and ther is no speed limit for space expansion

6. Space expand when heated and contract when cooled

7. Space is constant with no temperature, pressure and anything

8. Time is a special measurement of universal space expansion. As time decrease, Space becomes eventually smaller and vice versa.

9. Space makes up everything, including all particles, energy carriers and matter particles.

10. Space modification is done when we heat something in somewhere in space. Thus, it is space that expand when heated, not particles gaining kinetic energy. It is just space inside subatomic particles gain kinetic energy and expand. Because space is universal and constant, as time passes by, space modification is constantly competing with other modifications done but space expands beyond the speed of light, thus unmeasurable but still obeying certain laws in quantum mechanics. Quantum is just a representative of space in packet form.

11.The heat that cause space to expand is originated from the source in it, not from outside the space.

 

First, let`s figure out the concept of space. Where is space? It is everywhere. Nothing is outside space. So, we are going to solve the first mystery-What happens before Big Bang?. In my opinion, there are a few possibilities. First, we have a mother universe-a 10-dimensional space full of either mass or energy(If the mother universe is full of mass, then it would be quite smaller than our current universe.Why? Because E=mc². Little mass in mother universe will transform into huge amount of energy while due to insufficient time or certain resistance (another mystery), not all mass transform into energy some retain thus forming you and me today! If our mother universe is full of energy, then vice versa!). From time to time, the gravitions accumulate and become unstable. Our 10 dimensional space became unstable and eventually collapse. The 4-dimensional space becomes smaller and the 6-dimensional space expands, they eventually merge to form the universal space we know today.

 

Secondly, let`s reconsider the bell ringing vacuum experiment. In this experiment, we place a ringing bell inside a bell jar. Then, the bell jar is vacuumed by a vacuum pump. We would eventually realised the ringing sound is getting fainter and fainter. Then, when all the air is sucked out, the ringing sound is completely faint (Not being heard). According to The Theory of Space, you didn`t suck out the space inside the bell jar, if you did suck out the space, the bell jar will have collapsed. So, if you can magnify or vibrate the space until it reaches the same frequency as the bell ringing frequency, resonance is achieved. You can now hear the sound, but not the sound from the bell, it is just the resonance of space itself!

 

That is all for now. As I had mentioned earlier, I don`t provide any mathematical formula or any observed data or even computer simulations to support my pure thought. I hope all of the science community will help to work out the final results. Thank you.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Nicholas Kang

[Ophiolite]

What evidence do you have that supports your hypothesis?

 

What would you falsify your hypothesis?

[Mordred]

scientifically speaking space is just geometric volume filled with the contents of the universe, space itself has no energy or matter. Space geometry is determined by energy-density relations between matter and the cosmological constant, as compared to the critical density. 7 and 6 are in conflict with one another "if space is constant with no pressure etc how does it expand? Superluminal expansion depends on the separation distance of measurement. Hubble's law states the greater the separation distance the greater the recessive velocity

 

[latex]V=HD[/latex]

 

here is a good article on the misconceptions on superluminal expansion

http://tangentspace.info/docs/horizon.pdf :Inflation and the Cosmological Horizon by Brian Powell

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808 :"Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the Universe" Lineweaver and Davies

 

how particles gain kinetic energy, is well understood there is little mystery there, much of which is described by basic physics (heat) laws of thermodynamics. Your theory doesn't explain how to handle the laws of thermodynamics, which in cosmology is covered under the ideal gas equations. The FLRW metric does include the equations of state, which is the ideal gas portion

 

a theory such as this without the supportive math is just a hypothesis without proof

Edited May 30, 2014 by Mordred

[Nicholas Kang]

I am so sorry to tell you that I am just a 15-year-old secondary student. The above hypothesis is just a pure thought. I am limited to my own standard. I am still a school student. I am admire of Albert Einstein. He also propose his Theory of Relativity upon pure thought. I will try my best to cope with your reply. Thanks.

My aim is to reconstruct the structure of the universe with a brand new theory. I have long thought of how space and the universe evolve. I am interested in explaning them. I am really sorry for anything wrong in the above article. I am not a true expert yet.

 

I promise you that I will continue attaining new knowledge in Physics when I am studying in the university in the near future.

 

I welcome any comments, corrections and improvement on my pure thought to make it even more sensible and scientific. Do provide mathematical formula if possible.

 

Your comments, corrections and improvement are highly appreciated.

 

Thank you.

When I first proposed this pure thought in Nature Physics Journal, my thought was rejected but being praised for stimulating others thinking about such questions.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Nicholas Kang

[Delta1212]

Points 6 and 7 seem to directly contradict one another. How can something expand when heated and contract when cooled while simultaneously having no temperature?

 

Edit: Also, Einstein didn't come up with Relativity from pure thought. This is a fiction perpetuated by people who don't want to acknowledge that they might need to learn some math. Einstein's ideas had a solid foundation in mathematics and were an exploration of the consequences of the constant speed of light that had already cropped up in Maxwell's equations for describing EM waves.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Delta1212

[Nicholas Kang]

My idea is space creates what we see and measure today. Space expands because space itself creates what wesee and measure today. and it is what we see and measure today that cause space to expand. Space creates matter, energy and atoms. I lit up a candle. It burns. I see soot and feel the heat emited. The heat cause space expands. I did some correction upon answering your question.

 

Thanks for your comment and correction. I appreciate a lot for that.

I came across a book introducing Einstein`s Theory of Relativity. The book did make some introduction about Einstein`s life. In one part, the book did say that Eistein was once kicked out from the gymnasium in Germany or Switzerland(I couldn`t remember). Then, he moved to Italy due to some family busniess. One day, while he was cycling around a park in Italy. He asked himself a question: What would happen if I was sitting beside a light? Would I see a stationary light beam? This question lead him towards his success in Special Theory of Relativity which stated: The speed of light is independent of its motion and the motion of the observer. If Einstein wasn`t thought of this phenomena when he was 16 years old, he won`t succeed in proposing his theory 10 years later. A common sentence said by most Einstein-related books: In the past 10 years of thinking, I find out that there is no such thing. The thing refers to his pure thought of light semms to be stationary when viewed in parallel motion with light. Light is electromagnetic wave which is made up of constantly changing magnetic and electric field due to accelerating electrons. If the EM is stationary, the EM will have disappeared. There will be no light. He did understand Maxwell Equations but that was when he entered ETH in Switzerland. His foundation in Science and Maths when he was just 16 years old and being kicked out of school weren`t that firm as compared to when he was in Zurich Polythenic Institute, Switzerland. A book even reported that Einstein was mumbling because the ETH didn`t teach the latest Maxwell Equations.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Nicholas Kang

[Mordred]

Its good to see a 15 year old so interested in Cosmology, that being said the best route for you to undertake understanding cosmology is to understand what the current models and science already understands about cosmology and why. A very common mistake is to try and reinvent the wheel or think outside the box, without understanding what is inside the box.

 

The FLRW metric is an exact solution to Einsteins field equations, currently the strongest model is the LCDM model or lambdaCDM ,[latex]\Lambda CDM[/latex]

 

this is essentially the hot big bang model with the cosmological constant aka dark energy and dark matter included. In light of my advice here is some entrance articles other than the 2 I already posted above.

 

http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4446 :"What we have leaned from Observational Cosmology." -A handy write up on observational cosmology in accordance with the LambdaCDM model.

 

http://www.phinds.com/balloonanalogy/ : A thorough write up on the balloon analogy used to describe expansion

http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/redshift-and-expansion
http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/universe-geometry

 

textbook style

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0004188v1.pdf :"ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY"- A compilation of cosmology by Juan Garcıa-Bellido
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409426 An overview of Cosmology Julien Lesgourgues
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0503203.pdf "Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology" by Andrei Linde

 

historical articles handy to get a picture in how cosmology developed

 

http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/hubble-law-redshift1929.htm
Reprint of one of Hubbles papers.
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/einstein/works/1910s/relative/relativity.pdf
An authorized reprint of Einsteins Special relativity paper.
http://apod.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debate20.html
The "Great debate of the 20's" jubilee reprint article available

 

this one covers Friedmann (FLRW metric)

http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.1498 " “The Waters I am Entering No One yet Has Crossed”: Alexander Friedman and the Origins of Modern Cosmology" written by Ari Belenkiy

 

these articles are essentially entry level with some exceptions, but they should get you started, good luck in your studies.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Mordred

[ACG52]

Yes, Einstein asked the question when he was 16, and spent the next ten years studying and learning how to answer it.

[Nicholas Kang]

Its good to see a 15 year old so interested in Cosmology, that being said the best route for you to undertake understanding cosmology is to understand what the current models and science already understands about cosmology and why. A very common mistake is to try and reinvent the wheel or think outside the box, without understanding what is inside the box.

 

The FLRW metric is an exact solution to Einsteins field equations, currently the strongest model is the LCDM model or lambdaCDM ,[latex]\Lambda CDM[/latex]

 

this is essentially the hot big bang model with the cosmological constant aka dark energy and dark matter included. In light of my advice here is some entrance articles other than the 2 I already posted above.

 

http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4446 :"What we have leaned from Observational Cosmology." -A handy write up on observational cosmology in accordance with the LambdaCDM model.

 

http://www.phinds.com/balloonanalogy/ : A thorough write up on the balloon analogy used to describe expansion

http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/redshift-and-expansion

http://cosmology101.wikidot.com/universe-geometry

 

textbook style

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0004188v1.pdf :"ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY"- A compilation of cosmology by Juan Garcıa-Bellido

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409426 An overview of Cosmology Julien Lesgourgues

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0503203.pdf "Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology" by Andrei Linde

 

historical articles handy to get a picture in how cosmology developed

 

http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/hubble-law-redshift1929.htm

Reprint of one of Hubbles papers.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/einstein/works/1910s/relative/relativity.pdf

An authorized reprint of Einsteins Special relativity paper.

http://apod.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debate20.html

The "Great debate of the 20's" jubilee reprint article available

 

this one covers Friedmann (FLRW metric)

http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.1498 " “The Waters I am Entering No One yet Has Crossed”: Alexander Friedman and the Origins of Modern Cosmology" written by Ari Belenkiy

 

these articles are essentially entry level with some exceptions, but they should get you started, good luck in your studies.

 

Thanks, Mordred. I really appreciate your comment. You are right. I should understand the basics before heading towards the advance.

But, I should also emphasize the fact that laws of physics can always be replaced as new theory emerges.

Edited May 31, 2014 by Nicholas Kang