Graviton field spins Higgs into Gluon strings?

[kristalris]

GR & QM as an mathematical extrapolation assume a mass-less, absolutely straight flying photon. This has never been observed. So it is a galloping unicorn that probably is preventing marrying these two best laws (not theories) we humans have ever had. Logic dictates that striving for a TOE you discard all boundaries and there is one in between GR & QM. So we can as a speculation replace one galloping unicorn by another. we can assume an infinite amount of unspun gravitons in a field and an infinite amount of larger slower Higgs particles being spun into Gluons (Gravitons causing spin two in stead of having that) whereby all mass is un-splitable un-compressible yet deformable and only on average act like a perfect elastic sphere.

 

A photon can thus be seen as built up of two counter rotating interlocked spiraling strings of six Gluons each. Matter and anti matter energy packet. Flying seemingly straight and having a meter long wave in the double fields. All held together by the pressure of the infinite universe.

 

Larger strings can't hit c in the same way a helicopter can't hit mach 1 because the tip of the rotor hits mach 1. The larger the helicopter the slower you get. Like an atom.

 

In another thread I went into the sort of order this probably is: a double dynamic crystal.

 

It thus probably is a hologram and that accounts for not having interference other than in the double slit experiment when you detour the photon in one of the slits having the stern wave in effect catching up through the other slit causing interference. When observed you hit the energy packet with Gluons keeping it ahead of the stern wave: no interference.

 

Entanglement because the crystal helps keep the order two extra strings are provided for the split photon. One polarized Alice and one Bob. This was in the cards at the making of the photon in the laser. The second measurement breaks the symmetry. No Spooky Voodoo needed all nicely Newton.

 

Easily testable by seeing if light from a distant galaxy is more red-shifted at one side than the other: if so accelerating photon holding c in the curve and like a car curving in at twice the Newton value.

 

For the time being when having a QM or GR problem simply take the photon to be mass-less and straight flying again. It will work within the boundaries.if you don't go to small or outside where you can expect the particles of the SM to be present.

 

No beginning no end multi-verse as our universe. No where does this speculation infringe on any science whatsoever. For gravity is simply the under pressure caused by Higgs field becoming one of eight sizes of Gluon. A hit no hit scenario like a machine gun firing through a propeller.

 

The jumping of the electron is an observed speed > c. because we are built up out of strings we only observe movement at c, akin like when pushing a large boat from a jetty first doesn't seem to move either. An illusion you all fell for.

 

Assuming that it isn't magic like something from nothing Escher institute mathematics less likely than having a God that isn't a blatant contradiction then MN is probably an illusionist and in that case it all has probably got more simple in stead of difficult given more evidence since Einstein also pointed out that God doesn't play dice and that it probably are hidden variables at play. Well they are already described then by science..The only thing we have to do is work it like a crime scene. Don't ry to get a paradigm change by clinging on to a paradigm method that is proven wrong already by the simple fact that it can't disprove this position yet will never show result if this position is indeed correct. => only testing a creatively fully adult yin and yang guess does that.

 

Humour and relative thought is a survival trait to be taken seriously.. If you can only guess well what the authority of peers think or what is probably best for the relationship or for yourself the latter the psychopath who isn't mad at all yet only fearless for not being able to guess that something bad might happen which is also good for survival in 1% of cases. Yet leads to bizarre guesses whereas the others guess below par thus you will then not reach a stated goal. In an unsafe environment only 9% can guess above par. In a safe environment it is only 49%.

 

Current GR & QM are yin without yang. No tension thus per observable correct definition lame. Evident incomplete evidence and the Lex parsimony dictate this correct and it is not democratic majority peer rule. It is your prime suspect and thus not yet the proven culprit yet in need of investigation.

[kristalris]

I smell a humourless cookie monster.Anyway I forgot to ad a bit of my playlist showing where current science goes wrong in reasoning, it is not democratic:

 

Watch 23:19 end of argument on the game of reason to 29:06 end of showing the incorrect way of reasoning a democratic majority of scientists commit:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83aGieH4MWU&list=PLel4K7I4PMZnPwNrAzoTRJ-eK3JH3Dl4F

 

Problem for you is nowhere do I one iota infringe on logic or any observation of science, yet I provide a testable proposition (even plural). Enjoy.

[kristalris]

Hmm, seven bad rep points. I wonder should someone be able to pass a physics exam when having forgot to take into account the most important instrument to be used?

 

Say an amp-meter accurate A and not accurate B types and both in hi: H and low L amperage types. And the Volt meters A and B and Hi and Low Voltage. You mix it up and blow up the Voltmeter during the exam. Yet give off bad rep points.

 

Out of the paradigm is a high Voltage measurement. MN has provided a minority of us with this H type. You can measure this by checking if it has original humour. An amp-meter has irony ability BTW.

 

You lot measure a high Voltage idea and blow up. Demanding that I rewire you before measurement. Why do the simple test? Well, you get there quicker if the idea proves correct for it delivers a paradigm shift => you then can measure that higher Voltage as well.

 

Unless you already know there is no red-shift difference between one and another side of a distant galaxy? If you don't how come bad rep points?

 

Edit: And two more negative rep points. Oh lest I forget, any paradigm shift question is out of the box and thus inherently high voltage. This doesn't mean to say the to be tested idea is correct or not. The to be tested machine might work or not work, that is for the test to show. yet it is always high voltage. MN has provided humour as a clear survival trait in order to handle these high voltage questions and come up with good testable idea's. A good idea might prove not to work, concluding then it was a bad idea is committing the fallacy of a hind sight bias. To distinguish between good and bad idea's requires humour. If you lack humour and pose position on high voltage issues you blow up and thus deem any out of the box idea good or bad as bad. This says more about you than the idea.

The test BTW might prove to be un-measurable and thus not provide an answer. That doesn't mean you shouldn't try and take an as accurate as possible look. For if there indeed is a measurable constant red-shift anomaly with GR then GR is shot right out of the water with its absolutely straight flying photon. Yet even in that case GR reamins a valid law of physics, yet within a new constraint of a found boundary.

Edited June 13, 2014 by kristalris