Garry Denke Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 ***Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed.*** Question No. 1. Concerning the mapping of easternmost Posthole at A (the 4th blackened circle on most Stonehenge maps), located 18ft due west of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and blacken in on any map a posthole, such as the easternmost Posthole at A, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such easternmost Posthole at A does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Question No. 2. Concerning the mapping of Heelstone's western elder circular ditch 9ft missing portion (the thinnest darkened portion on most Stonehenge maps), located 13ft west-southwest of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and darken in on any map a ditch, such as Heelstone's western circular ditch 9ft missing portion, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such elder circular ditch portion does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication; Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Question No. 3. Why is the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench not mapped honoring the detailed sample descriptions of the original C6 cross-section creators, Lt.-Col. William Hawley and Robert Newall, on most Stonehenge maps? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Same original C6 cross-section at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum: http://www.aboutbritain.com/SalisburyMuseum.htm?RefID=1504297 -- 6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed. Lydian lion electrum coins (7) in WA3607 scroll trench, 1 recovered. Described in daily Journal No. 4 at Stonehenge on 19th May 1923. Remaining artifacts along and at 12ft bottom of Inigo Jones' Stone-Heng Restored scroll trench East of coined Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing). Gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c), gold table (2c-1c-1.5c), gold altar (1c-1c-2c), gold candlestick, gold breastplate, gold ephod, gold censer, and brass laver, all, inside brass altar (5c-5c-3c) located beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings (pictured below). Jones' brass altar (5c-5c-3c) top side at 7.5ft augered depth. Scrolling trench 9ft wide 33ft long description from Stonehole B (WA3606) to 12ft below Heelstone 96 (Stonehole 163) surface: BEGINNING at mapped Stonehole B (WA3606), THENCE deepening Northeast, THENCE cutting Easternmost Posthole at A (missing), through C6 cross-section right triangle at southwest side, and Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing), THENCE East pass Stonehole 97 disturbance at northern side to beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings. Artifacts below Denoco Inc.'s ATT refraction seismic station No. 96 (sledgehammer source) recorded at Stonehenge on 1st April 1985. Salisbury Museum and above publication maps contour 33ft long broad cut scroll trench short by 25ft showing WA3607 only 8ft long. Robert Newall's 1923 scroll trench map contour short of Hawley's cross-sections and scroll trench East side under Heelstone (embedded 4.5ft). Three 1985 refraction seismic lines confirm Hawley's cross-sections and 9ft wide 33ft long scroll trench length and depths. Denoco Inc.'s ATT two north-south lines traverse WA3607 scroll trench width, and one east-west cross line ties along its length. English Heritage's AMLab 75 Ohm-m^2/m 1994 resistivity survey (above publication: Figure 261; Page 500) traceplot of raw resistivity data confirms ATT refraction seismic recordings. Upload of coined 6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench 1984 magnetic-electromagnetic (EM-GPR) and 1985 refraction seismic maps and cross-sections to follow shortly. For MSN users: http://groups.msn.com/stonehengewhitestones http://groups.msn.com/arkarchaeology http://groups.msn.com/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics http://groups.msn.com/geomagnetism http://groups.msn.com/paleomagnetism For YAHOO users: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengewhitestones http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arkarchaeology http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics http://groups.yahoo.com/group/geomagnetism http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleomagnetism For FORUM users: http://www.garrydenke.com/stonehenge.htm'>http://www.garrydenke.com/stonehenge.htm http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke http://www.webspawner.com/users/garrydenke/index.html http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke http://www.garrydenke.bravehost.com Discussion at this forum appreciated. Garry W. Denke Geologist/Geophysicist Denoco Inc. of Texas Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488 Plano, Texas 75086-6488 Tel: 972-422-8268 Fax: 972-423-6337 Cell: 940-521-1667 http://www.garrydenke.com GarryDenke@garrydenke.com http://www.denocoinc.com GarryDenke@denocoinc.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumblebum Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Just in case there are those who have never heard, Mr Denke believes the Ark of the Covenant is buried beneath Stonehenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted March 3, 2005 Author Share Posted March 3, 2005 Just in case there are those who have never heard, Mr Denke believes the Ark of the Covenant is buried beneath Stonehenge.Thank you Stumblebum. Covered in the above post. For those interested... The above publication is out of print but available through interlibrary loan. If one is so inclined comparison of the C6 cross-section cited in the above English Heritage 1995 publication, to the Hawley and Newall original 1923 map published in 1925, is available at most universities (at Southern Methodist University of Dallas for certain) in The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, published by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, in Volume 5, at Page 21 preceeding, Plate IX. Nice photograph (black and white) in The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, in Volume 5, at Page 25 preceeding, Plate X, same in the above English Heritage 1995 publication, et al, including Stonehenge Complete by Christopher Chippindale, all 3 editions. But save and except for the C6 cross-section showing the detailed sample descriptions of the subject scrolling trench, none of the maps or photgraphs show it: because; Hawley and Newall did not excavate it completely so as not to disturb the Stonehole B (WA3606) area any further northeast of the scrolling trench origination (WA3607) area. Why? The subject scrolling trench was so large and deepening so rapidly to the northeast-east toward the west side of Heelstone, that if they had excavated it completely to the northeast-east, none of the features in its path would have been left to photograph, and present (sound familiar?), at the annual Report on the Excavations at Stonehenge reading, which occurred on 19th June 1924 covering the season of 1923. Basically, they were told to stop short and illustrate their to date findings, save and except for the large scrolling trench. Unfortunately, the Office of Works blocked any more excavation of the northeast-east scrolling trench, from Stonehole B (WA3606) to the Heelstone, and history has left us with the Hawley and Newall correctly drafted maps, incorporating dashed lines for undefinite features, and solid lines for definite features (see The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, published by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, in Volume 5, at Page 21 preceeding, Plate IX.), and, of course, all of the misleading maps which followed in the solid lined Stonehenge publications. Thus, the historical question as to why the subject trench was neither fully excavated nor mapped any further than the northeast line of WA3607 is answered, the artistic question is is anyone here interested in expressing it artistically using our seismic refraction contour map as a basis, and the scientific question is when is the next seismic refraction survey going to be conducted over it because the first one is twenty (20) years old, and outdated. I think we should complete the excavation of 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench began by William Hawley and Robert Newall through artistic expression of it, based upon all the above facts of the matter, and any more facts that may be acquired. ATT, 1st April 1985 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newtonian Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 It can't be,i have it right here with me!. Next to my 'how to be a good creationist' by C.R.DARWIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted March 4, 2005 Author Share Posted March 4, 2005 It can't be' date='i have it right here with me!.Next to my 'how to be a good creationist' by C.R.DARWIN.[/quote']Hello Newtonian, http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/compass/ixbin/hixclient.exe?_IXDB_=compass&_IXSR_=qo4&_IXSS_=%2524%2bwith%2ball_unique_id_index%2bis%2b%2524%3dOBJ4379%26_IXNOMATCHES_%3dgraphical%252fno_matches%252ehtml%26_IXMAXHITS_%3d1%26_IXDB_%3dcompass%26_IXFIRST_%3d1&_IXFIRST_=1&_IXMAXHITS_=1&_IXSPFX_=graphical/full/lg&_IXimg=k127625.jpg&submit-button=summary Best wishes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarchaus Posted April 2, 2005 Share Posted April 2, 2005 what the hell is that thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted April 2, 2005 Author Share Posted April 2, 2005 what the hell is that thing? There is No fourth Posthole at 'A' Cross-sections Quadrant bearings -------------------------------- http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/MAP_12.5percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/CenterMAP_25percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/MAP_25percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/CenterMAP_50percent.gif Round the Heelstone clockwise Start 12:00 o'clock ------------------------------------------------ 1) A-A' (1979) C91 quadrant bearing; N 73 E 2) B-B' (1953) C36 quadrant bearing; S 67 E 3) C-C' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 57 E 4) D-D' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; South 5) E-E' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 6) F-F' (1923) C6 quadrant bearings; S 2 W - S 22 E 7) G-G' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 8) H-H' (1956) C51 quadrant bearing; S 63 E 9) I-I' (1979) C91 quadrant bearings; S 71 E - S 34 E - S 71 E / S 71 E http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_a.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_b.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig184.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Causeway2.jpg Stonehenge, Heelstone, UK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted November 20, 2005 Author Share Posted November 20, 2005 Here is the red tape that is currently holding up the recharging of Earth's magnetic field as it continues its decrease toward Tesla zero. On 26th July 2005 the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council refused English Heritage's application for excavation and removal of A-344 road beside Heelstone: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.5437 English Heritage's application, approved by the Northern Area Committee of Salisbury District Council at its meeting of 19th July 2005, was refused by the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council on 26th July 2005, because it did not provide for excavating and removing the Heelstone artifacts: http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke 1) brass altar (5c-5c-3c) 2) gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c) 3) gold table (2c-1c-1.5c) 4) gold altar (1c-1c-2c) 5) gold candlestick 6) gold breastplate 7) gold ephod 8) gold censer 9) brass laver http://www.garrydenke.com/seismic.htm 1) A-A' (1979) C91 quadrant bearing; N 73 E 2) B-B' (1953) C36 quadrant bearing; S 67 E 3) C-C' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 57 E 4) D-D' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; South 5) E-E' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 6) F-F' (1923) C6 quadrant bearings; S 2 W - S 22 E 7) G-G' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 8) H-H' (1956) C51 quadrant bearing; S 63 E 9) I-I' (1979) C91 quadrant bearings; S 71 E - S 34 E - S 71 E / S 71 E http://www.salisbury.gov.uk/council/contact English Heritage was very surprised, and disappointed, by Salisbury District Council's decision, but they now know the grounds for refusal are ones which can easily be resolved when English Heritage submits the amended scheme providing for the excavation and removal of the Heelstone artifacts and A-344 road. http://www.gnn.gov.uk/content/detail.asp?NewsAreaID=2&ReleaseID=175616 The review will be taken forward by a steering group consisting of representatives from: the Department for Transport; the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; the Highways Agency; the Government Office for the South West; and statutory advisers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ophiolite Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Here is the red tape that is currently holding up the recharging of Earth's magnetic field as it continues its decrease toward Tesla zero. ? You see Gary, everyone can post the same thing in many forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokele Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 You see Gary, everyone can post the same thing in many forums. Not anymore he can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eruheru Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Just in case there are those who have never heard, Mr Denke believes the Ark of the Covenant is buried beneath Stonehenge. could scientists create a sonar like devise and scan the ground near stonehenge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokele Posted November 20, 2005 Share Posted November 20, 2005 Why bother? It's not science's job to disprove every crackpot theory that comes along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinWalker Posted May 25, 2006 Share Posted May 25, 2006 Wow. What was he thinking when he posted these links?: http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_a.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_b.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig184.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Causeway2.jpg They're a hoot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now