barfbag Posted July 6, 2014 Posted July 6, 2014 @ Ophiolite, The last post was answered but the thread was moved so I will answer again. Debunking your misinterpretation of sound science would be educationally beneficial for some of us One already open. Have at er. I must admit I'm looking forward to this sound scientific thrashing you are about to unleash there. Here is the thread. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/83658-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-thread-split/?p=810199 (Maybe it might be you who learns something) -3
Ophiolite Posted July 6, 2014 Posted July 6, 2014 I've taken a look at the thread. (Thank you for that.) I see you were already handed your ass on a plate there. It would be unkind of me to repeat the exercise. Now let's not derail this thread for a second time. If you feel a need to reply please pm me. That way you may avoid more of the negative rep you've already been given for your last post. 1
barfbag Posted July 7, 2014 Author Posted July 7, 2014 I see you were already handed your ass on a plate there Really? LENR is not even questionable as far as I'm concerned, sorry you won't be handing my , mind being publicly disassembled public disassembly to me. Smarter to pick your battles. NOTE: There was no moderator note, but my argument for "Proof of God" is that we are already in mass communication with each other already so god was not as much of an imaginative stretch. But apparently my "Proof of God" was moved to another thread in the trash. Personally I think my "Proof of God" had more substance than the OP bar code theory, but I guess not as many here are really capable of understanding the relationship between telepathy and mass consciousness. It must be a tougher stretch of the imagination than some are capable of. Maybe I need to slow down and simplify things when I write? So I have resigned from this thread and if you think I am not responding then please check other thread. It was not rudeness on my part.
Recommended Posts