Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, I would like to understand what makes ribose a stronger reducing sugar than glucose. They both have an aldehyde functional group to be oxidized but they differ in their structure as a pentose vs hexose. Is it their structure that makes one more easily converted to an open structure and be oxidized than the other? Any clue or direction will help a lot! Thanks

Posted

I think it has to do with their conformational structures. Glucose having the ability to change into a boat conformation renders it theoretically more stable than ribose, which utilizes the envelope or twist conformation as it's most stable conformation.

 

-since ribose has a generally less stable conformation than glucose, it should be more reactive.

 

~ee

Posted

What makes you think ribose is a stronger reducing agent than glucose?

 

I am just curious, since in the 2,2'-bicinchoninic acid reducing end analysis, glucose gives a much higher response curve than ribose (Absorbance/concentration Slope). I recognize the only factor is not the reactivity to the 2,2'-bicinchoninate disodium salt at the reducing end but also the absorptivity of the new compound produced from the sugar and the 2,2'-bicinchoninate disodium salt that gives the blue color at 560 nm ABS. See std curve below.

 

One possibility is since Ribose is a 5 carbon ring (aldopentose) while glucose is a 6 carbon ring (aldohexose), there is more pressure for ribose to open up (since ring bonds will be tighter stretched) thus making it more reactive at the reducing end.

 

29ayvlu.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.