xyzt Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 There is no such thing as 'absolute velocity" There is no such thing as absolute time, time is frame-dependent. Your "theories" are fringe. 1
xiaojun Posted July 21, 2014 Author Posted July 21, 2014 The observed by the moving stripes, (10) type can be calculated absolute velocity of the earth.
xyzt Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 The observed by the moving stripes, (10) type can be calculated absolute velocity of the earth. No, it cannot since there is no "moving" of the stripes. This has been known for over 100 years now. 1
imatfaal Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 ! Moderator Note Moved to Speculations. Please take a moment to read the specific rules of that subforum
xiaojun Posted July 21, 2014 Author Posted July 21, 2014 (edited) No, it cannot since there is no "moving" of the stripes. This has been known for over 100 years now. Day and night the fringe is 1 points, not 100 years without moving stripes Edited July 21, 2014 by xiaojun
xyzt Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Day and night the fringe is 1 points, not 100 years without moving stripes It has been MORE than 100 years that mainstream science has established that you cannot determine "absolute" speed. The diurnal strip variation is due to changes in temperature between day and night. This has also been known for about 70 years. 1
xiaojun Posted July 21, 2014 Author Posted July 21, 2014 It has been MORE than 100 years that mainstream science has established that you cannot determine "absolute" speed. The diurnal strip variation is due to changes in temperature between day and night. This has also been known for about 70 years. The theme of the theoretical results are derived according to the theory of relativity, the results confirm the existence of absolute velocity, which explain the theory of relativity is not self consistent.
Strange Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 The theme of the theoretical results are derived according to the theory of relativity, the results confirm the existence of absolute velocity, which explain the theory of relativity is not self consistent. A more plausible explanation is that you have made a mistake.
xiaojun Posted July 23, 2014 Author Posted July 23, 2014 A more plausible explanation is that you have made a mistake. （1）式是根据相对论理论在解释迈克尔逊实验时得到的理论结果.你可能是怀疑（1）式错误. (1) is obtained according to theory to explain the Michelson experiment when the theory of relativity results you may doubt (1) error
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now