Sorcerer Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Does it make any sense to look at time from non-beginning to non-end in a fractal sense, if we model it mathematically?
studiot Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Since there is only one temporal dimension, any proposal can only look at it fractally in a Cantor's dust sort of way. https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&source=hp&q=cantor+dust+fractal+dimension&gbv=2&oq=cantors+dust&gs_l=heirloom-hp.1.3.0i10j0i22i30l9.1265.3640.0.6422.12.12.0.0.0.0.156.1408.1j11.12.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.12.1408.5-hF1xKtqq4 does this help?
Strange Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 That's why it's a question So you are asking if a non-existent model makes sense? Is a non-existent cake delicious?
Mordred Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 (edited) There have been fractal universe models proposed the problem with them is that they are not Lorentz invariant. This is a major problem for fractal based models. "Despite the beautiful physics emerging from the HL picture, inspired by critical and condensed-matter systems, it potentially suffers from at least one major problem. Lorentz invariance, one of the best constrained symmetries of Nature, is surrendered at fundamental level." here is a review of HL gravity. "Quantum field theory, gravity and cosmology in a fractal universe" http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0571.pdf due to the Lorentz invariance constraints this model is largely not well considered as well as the problems mentioned in this paper Edited July 23, 2014 by Mordred 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now