Inversely Proportional Nesting Doll Systems and a formula for Matter

[Alias Moniker]

Inversely Proportional Nesting Doll Systems

1. All physical systems are composed of Energy and Matter. Energy and Matter form stable, proportional systems that have Mass. Mass is the combination of Energy and Matter. Without Energy, Matter does not have Mass, and without Matter, Energy does not have Mass. Matter = tm (system's total mass) - em (system's energy mass [force, acceleration, potential and kinetic]). Energy and Matter are always attracted to each other (strong force) but repel themselves (weak force). The 'isolation' state of energy is C and the 'isolation' state of Matter is 'zero point energy' or 'rest mass'.

2. Physical systems are formed as individual particles of Energy and Matter begin to approximate to each other's "velocities" from their 'isolation' states. First Energy attracts Matter and forms a Matter system, then the more massive Matter System attracts Energy and creates an Energy System, then that Energy System attracts Matter and creates a Matter System, then that Matter System attracts Energy... Subsequently, new Physical Systems will be produced two ways

2A. Subsystems may combine within a system to create new Subsystems.

2B. The further approximation of velocities of Energy to Matter creates new Physical Systems (magnitudes).

3. Physical systems can exist within Physical systems. When they do, the relationship of Matter to Energy in the Mass of a system is inversely proportional to the systems that it contains and the system that it is contained within. For example, an Atom and a Solar System are both stable physical systems. In the Atomic System, the Energy content of the system orbits the Matter content of the system (Energetic Electrons orbiting Material Nucleus), creating a Physical System, an Atom. Inversely, in the Solar System, the Matter of the system orbits the Energy of the system (Material Planets orbiting Plasma (low matter Star), creating a Physical System, a Solar System. There are many Atoms in the Atomic System, these are sub-systems and their relationships to each other are not inverse. Without the Atomic System, the Solar System would not be possible, so we say that the Atomic System contains the Solar System; this relationship is inverse (the Atomic System does not directly contain the Solar System but they are an uneven distance from each other in the alternating magnitudes of Systems.)

3A. The order of Physical Systems from least massive to most massive might be:

Quantum Magnitude / Energy contains Matter - (unknown)

Nuclear Magnitude / Matter contains Energy (Nucleus)

Atomic Magnitude / Energy contains Matter - Electron orbits Nucleus (Atom)

Compounds Magnitude / Matter Contains Energy - (Molecules and Compounds)

Inorganic Compounds

Organic Compounds

Massive Bodies - Solids, Liquids and Gasses

Large Massive Bodies - Asteroids, Planets

Star Magnitude / Energy contains Matter - Electromagnetic Field contains Plasma (Star)

Solar Magnitude / Matter contains Energy - Matter Planets orbit Energy (mass but not Matter) Star (Solar System)

Galaxy Magnitude / Energy contains Matter - .... contains Solar System (Galaxy)

Universe Magnitude - unknown

Nebula Magnitude - unknown

The ratio for the growth of these systems might be 1.6180339887 or linked to ∏, since most systems have Matter or Energy circling the other in an orbit.

So then, Plasma is a mass of overwhelmingly Energy without Matter (hence how quickly a star dies if its core turns to Iron).

While "Black Holes" are 'mass' that is overwhelmingly Matter without Energy (hence their dramatic effects on Light, "C"). The life span for a black hole is the time that it takes for the smallest piece of matter to attract the energy mass by volume at the rate of absolute gravity that it requires to gain enough energy to break the barrier of not having mass and have mass (electron/quark/etc).

3B. More than one system can exist within a system. Co-systems within a system will not be inversely related to each other, only to the system they are contained within and the systems they contain. An example of this is the many similar Nucleus Co-systems (Hydrogen, Helium, etc) within the Nuclear System, and the many Molecules and Compounds within the Compound System. The interactions of co-systems will be determined by energy and matter contents of each system and especially whether Matter or Energy is in "orbit", or "containing", the other.

4. Energy Charge (+/-) is an effect of a physical system containing slightly more or less energy than is orbiting the system. For example, the Nucleus of an Atom is a system, where Matter contains Energy. This nucleus contains more energy than it is being orbited by (no electron), so it has a + energy charge. The amount of Matter in the system is proportional to the amount of Energy in the system, but the amount of Energy IN the system is more than the amount of energy orbiting the system, so any Nucleus alone has a + charge. This + charge attracts electrons, and they get as close to the Nucleus as they can get while still repelling against each other. If the packet sizes of electrons allows for equivalent energy between the Core and the Shell of the system, the system will be neutral. When the packet sizes of the electron do not allow for the energy in orbit to equal the energy in the core (the total energy of the previous system), the system becomes + or - charged. What type of "charge" or "current" (electromagnetic, electricity, potential and kinetic energy, horsepower, joules, newtons, etc) depends on the physical properties of the system that contains the energy. So while energy will travel at "C" when it is isolated, if energy is in a physical system it must behave according to the properties of that physical system. The properties of energy remain the same, but the system it is in define its ultimate behavior. The properties of a System, or Mass, are a factor of the Matter to Energy relationship in the Mass, dependent on properties of all of the Systems of Matter and Energy within the Mass.

Why do Protons and Neutrons have different masses?

1.67262E-27 kg Mass of Proton

1.67493E-27 kg Mass of Neutron

2.30557E-30 kg Difference in Mass between Proton and Neutron. What could amount for this?

9.10938E-31 kg Mass of an Electron. The Electron is from the Quantum Magnitude. For our measurements to be accurate in the Nuclear Magnitude, which we're working, we need to "convert" the Mass of the Electron in the Quantum Magnitude to the Mass of the Electron in the Nuclear Magnitude, so that we are considering the Proton, Neutron and Electron all in the same magnitude. We do this by applying the inverse proportion of the golden ratio to the Mass of the Electron in the Nuclear Magnitude.

5.62991E-31 kg - The Mass of the Electron in the Nuclear Magnitude. How many Electrons would fit into the difference between a Neutron and Proton?

4.095224815 Electrons fit into the difference between a Neutron and Proton.

2970.957432 Electrons fit into a Proton

2975.052656 Electrons fit into a Neutron

Edited July 27, 2014 by Alias Moniker

[Klaynos]

Before I bother responding to all of the physics problems in your post. Are you going to respond to this thread or ignore it like your recent ones?

[Sensei]

Why do Protons and Neutrons have different masses?

1.67262E-27 kg Mass of Proton

 

Only free proton has such rest mass.

 

More precise value is given in eV unit:

938272046 eV/c^2 (or shorter 938.272 MeV/c^2)

 

1.67493E-27 kg Mass of Neutron

 

Only free neutron has such rest mass.

 

More precise value is given in eV unit:

939.565 MeV/c^2

 

 

2.30557E-30 kg Difference in Mass between Proton and Neutron. What could amount for this?

Free neutron is decaying within 15 minutes:

n0 -> p+ + e- + Ve + 0.78 MeV

 

You can multiply mass in kg by c^2 to get energy in Joules, then divide by e = 1.602e-19, to get energy in eV electron Volt unit. MeV is 1e6 eV

 

See 9.11e-31 * 299792458^2 / 1.602e-19 = 510999 eV = 0.511 MeV

 

9.10938E-31 kg Mass of an Electron.

Actually rest mass of free electron (or positron) is

m_e = h*f_C/c^2

 

f_C - Compton Frequency = 1.23559*10^20

 

Photon with at least double Compton Frequency has E =1.022 MeV

and is able to create electron and positron in pair production.

 

4.095224815 Electrons fit into the difference between a Neutron and Proton.

2970.957432 Electrons fit into a Proton

2975.052656 Electrons fit into a Neutron

 

That's simply not true.

m_p/m_e = 1836.15 times heavier.

[Strange]

 

Why do Protons and Neutrons have different masses?

 

Partly because they are made up of different quarks (which each have different masses) and also because the binding energies are different. (Which is, I think, also why neutrons decay.)

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

 

Do you have a model to present, or is this just more discussion based on your lack of understanding of physics?

 

If you have a model, present it. Give us testable predictions and/or comparison with experiment.

 

If this is a matter of not knowing the physics, pick up a textbook or ask a proper question.

 

Even Speculations has its rules. This is not the "anything goes" section.