DEFINITIVE BREAKDOWN OF THE QUANTUM MECHANICS

[wlad]

The new experiment published by the journal Nature in the end of July 2014 represents the definitive breakdown of Quantum Mechanics, as explained ahead.

 

 

1) How photons are emitted by atoms according to Quantum Mechanics

According to the Quantum Mechanics, into the electrosphere of the atoms the electrons do not travel the space between two levels n and n+1. According to the theory, the electron disappears in the level n, and it appears instantaneously in the level n+1, without traveling along the space which separate the two levels.

 

The reason why the electron does not travel the space between the two levels in the atom is easy to be understood, and it is consequence of the assumptions adopted in the development of the Quantum Mechanics, as seeing ahead :

a) The space within the electrosphere of atoms is considered Euclidian
b) There is Coulomb attraction between the proton and the electron
c) Therefore, if the space between two levels had been travelled by the electron, it would have to be accelerated, because it is submitted to the force of attraction
d) By having acceleration, the electron would have to emit energy when moving in that space between the levels, according to the Maxwell’s law (continuous emission).
e) However, the experiments show that the atom does not emit energy continuously, but actually it emits discrete packages of energy (photons) only when the electron arrives to the points of emission in the levels n=1, 2, 3.. , etc.
f) Therefore, according to Quantum Mechanics, the electron cannot travel along the space between the levels, and that’s why according to the theory the electron disappears in one level, and it appears instantaneously in another level.

 

 

2) How photons are emitted by atoms according to Quantum Ring Theory

Unlike happens in Quantum Mechanics, according to the model of atom proposed in Quantum Ring Theory the electron travels the space between the levels within the electrosphere. In order to simplify the explanation, we will explain what happens in the hydrogen atom. The mechanism of the phenomenon according to QRT is the following:

 

a) The space within the electrosphere of atoms is non-Euclidian (there is a gradient of density which grows toward the direction of the proton).
b) The electron moves with helical trajectory in the electrosphere of the atom
c) The electron moves with CONSTANT speed between two energy levels, and this is the reason why it does not irradiate energy when it moves along the space between two levels
d) Because the space is non-Euclidian, when the electron is moving toward the direction of the proton, there is a growth in the inertia of the electron (it is a growth in the resistance of the electron against its acceleration toward the proton, because while the force of attraction grows inversely proportional to the decrease of the distance proton-electron, at the same time grows its resistance opposing the growth of the attraction force). The same happens when the electron is moving leaving away the proton.
e) Such constant speed of the electron in the electrosphere of the atoms can occur only in the atom model of Quantum Ring Theory, because the electrosphere is filled with aether (the reason why the space is non-Euclidian).

 

 

3) The Hans Dehmelt experiment

In 1989 Hans Dehmelt published a paper describing a new technology, which detected the trajectory of the electrons within the electrosphere of the atoms. His experiment proved to be wrong the assumption adopted in Quantum Mechanics, because he detected that the electron travels the space between two levels of energy in the atom.

 

Obviously that discovery had represented in 1989 the definitive breakdown of the Quantum Mechanics, because as the electrons travel the space between levels in the atom (as detected in the Dehmelt experiments), then according to Quantum Mechanics the atoms have be emitting energy continuously, and therefore the theory is denied by the experiments made concerning the atom emission.

In order to save Quantum Mechanics face to the definitive breakdown, the community of physicists adopted the strategy of claiming that in the Dehmelt experiment the atom is “dressed”. So, according that new ad hoc hypothesis, the electron actually does not travel the space between levels, however due to the new technology used by Dehmelt the measurements show an “apparent” trajectory of the electron, because thanks to that new technology the atom becomes “dressed”.

 

So, by this way the community of physicist succeeded to avoid the definitive collapse of the Quantum Mechanics along 25 years.

 

 

4) The experiment published by Nature in 2014

But finally now, in the end of July 2014, the journal Nature published a paper proving that Quantum Mechanics is indeed wrong, because the hypothesis of “dressed atom” is actually a bunch of baloney.

 

The experiment published by the journal Nature detected trajectories in a way different of that predicted in Quantum Mechanics:
Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4992

 

The experiment shows that the Interpretation of Copenhagen was wrong, as predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory.

Irfan Siddiqi, UC Berkeley associate professor of physics, says about the wrong entanglement of states considered in Quantum Mechanics:

“To Bohr and others, the process was instantaneous – when you opened the box, the entangled system collapsed into a definite, classical state. This postulate stirred debate in quantum mechanics, But real-time tracking of a quantum system shows that it’s a continuous process, and that we can constantly extract information from the system as it goes from quantum to classical. This level of detail was never considered accessible by the original founders of quantum theory.”
http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2014/07/30/watching-schrodingers-cat-die/

 

5) The experiment made by Aephraim Steinberg

The experiment published now in 2014 by Nature was performed thanks to a new technology, already used by Aephraim Steinberg, who published in 2012 a paper proving that Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity is also a bunch of baloney.
The meaning of Steinberg experiment is explained in the ZPEnergy:
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3295&mode=&order=0&thold=0

 

Steinberg, from the Toronto University-Canada, made the double-slit experiment with photons, and the results show that Quantum Mechanics is wrong, while Quantum Ring Theory is correct, because:

 

1- According to Quantum Mechanics, a quantum particle can behave either as a particle or as a wave, but it cannot behave as wave and as a particle at the same time.

2- Unlike, as Quantum Ring Theory considers that the wave-particle duality is consequence of the helical trajectory, then the particle can have interference with its own helical trajectory when it crosses a slit.
So, according to QRT, the quantum particle can behave as a wave and as a particle as the same time.

In the Steinberg experiment, a photon crossed a unique slit, and it had inferference with itself (a wave feature), while from Quantum Mechanics we would have to expect a particle feature only, since the photon crossed only one slit.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

1- This new technology is proving definitively that Quantum Mechanics was developed from wrong foundations, and it must be replaced by a new theory with new fundamental principles missing in Quantum Mechanics.

 

2- A new model of atom capable to explain how the electron can travel the space between levels in the atom must be developed from the new principles considered in the atom model proposed in Quantum Ring Theory.

[andrewcellini]

what do you want to discuss?

[wlad]

what do you want to discuss?

 

There is nothing to discuss about results of experiments.

 

You have to accept them, or not.

 

If you accept, you realize that Quantum Mechanics is wrong

 

If you dont accept, you betray the Scientific Method

 

Simply and easy to understand

[hoola]

I wonder what this "unique" single slit looked like in the steinberg experiment that gave two slit results?

Edited August 20, 2014 by hoola

[Enthalpy]

The first message only shows wrong understanding of QM. Which, well, could be interpreted as a weakness of the theory for being too complicated or abstract, but we humans don't decide how Nature behaves, we only try to model it.

 

In short:

• the two orbitals are not separated, they overlap; this is even mandatory for the transition to happen;
• the electron takes time to change its shape from one orbital to the other. It's called the fluorescence time and defines the transition bandwidth.

[swansont]

 

1) How photons are emitted by atoms according to Quantum Mechanics

According to the Quantum Mechanics, into the electrosphere of the atoms the electrons do not travel the space between two levels n and n+1. According to the theory, the electron disappears in the level n, and it appears instantaneously in the level n+1, without traveling along the space which separate the two levels.

 

 

Instantaneously? Where did you get that? I just attended a conference where one speaker was trying to measure how long ionization took.

 

So your objection is not to QM, but your straw man of QM. Yes, your straw man is certainly wrong.

[MigL]

An electron is not the only quantum particle.

Even if an electron's behaviour in the double slit experiment could be explaned by helical trajectories, how do you explain a photon's behaviour ?

[wlad]

 

Instantaneously? Where did you get that? I just attended a conference where one speaker was trying to measure how long ionization took.

 

So your objection is not to QM, but your straw man of QM. Yes, your straw man is certainly wrong.

 

 

Instantaneously or not, however according to Quantum Mechanics the electron does not travel the space between two levels

 

And the experiment published now in July 2014 by Nature shows that this not true, the electron travels the space between two points, supposed to be impossible by the Interpretation of Copenhagen.

 

The first message only shows wrong understanding of QM.

 

 

 

Dear Mr. Enthalpy,

tell it to Dr. Irfan Siddiqi, UC Berkeley associate professor of physics, says about the wrong entanglement of states considered in Quantum Mechanics:

“To Bohr and others, the process was instantaneous – when you opened the box, the entangled system collapsed into a definite, classical state. This postulate stirred debate in quantum mechanics, But real-time tracking of a quantum system shows that it’s a continuous process, and that we can constantly extract information from the system as it goes from quantum to classical. This level of detail was never considered accessible by the original founders of quantum theory.”

http://newscenter.be...ingers-cat-die/

[swansont]

 

 

Instantaneously or not, however according to Quantum Mechanics the electron does not travel the space between two levels

 

And the experiment published now in July 2014 by Nature shows that this not true, the electron travels the space between two points, supposed to be impossible by the Interpretation of Copenhagen.

 

You've claimed this but not actually cited a Nature article, so nobody can check to see if/how you've misinterpreted the experiment. If it's the arxiv link in item 4 in the OP, those are not atomic states.

[wlad]

 

You've claimed this but not actually cited a Nature article, so nobody can check to see if/how you've misinterpreted the experiment. If it's the arxiv link in item 4 in the OP, those are not atomic states.

 

 

4) The experiment published by Nature in 2014

But finally now, in the end of July 2014, the journal Nature published a paper proving that Quantum Mechanics is indeed wrong, because the hypothesis of “dressed atom” is actually a bunch of baloney.

 

The experiment published by the journal Nature detected trajectories in a way different of that predicted in Quantum Mechanics:

Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states

http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4992

 

The experiment shows that the Interpretation of Copenhagen was wrong, as predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory.

 

You've claimed this but not actually cited a Nature article, so nobody can check to see if/how you've misinterpreted the experiment. If it's the arxiv link in item 4 in the OP, those are not atomic states.

 

 

Atomic states obey to different laws of those fundamental laws that rule the Quantum Mechanics?

[Strange]

The experiment published by the journal Nature detected trajectories in a way different of that predicted in Quantum Mechanics:

 

That just isn't true (this experiment has been discussed in another thread). The experimental results are as predicted by quantum theory.

 

"When we looked at the data, we saw that the theorists were right."

http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/27133.aspx

 

 

The experiment shows that the Interpretation of Copenhagen was wrong, as predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory.

 

How can an interpretation be wrong? It is just an analogy to attempt to explain theory.

 

 

Atomic states obey to different laws of those fundamental laws that rule the Quantum Mechanics?

 

Apparently not.

[swansont]

 

 

4) The experiment published by Nature in 2014

But finally now, in the end of July 2014, the journal Nature published a paper proving that Quantum Mechanics is indeed wrong, because the hypothesis of “dressed atom” is actually a bunch of baloney.

 

The experiment published by the journal Nature detected trajectories in a way different of that predicted in Quantum Mechanics:

Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states

http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4992

 

The experiment shows that the Interpretation of Copenhagen was wrong, as predicted in the book Quantum Ring Theory.

 

They looked at "two quantum levels of a superconducting circuit (a qubit)", not atomic states. Funny that they don't mention dressed atoms at all, but do mention experiments used to examine wave function collapse.

 

So their view is pretty much the opposite of what you've claimed.

[studiot]

 

is actually a bunch of baloney.

 

Doesn't that just apply to this thread?