anthonycbush81 Posted August 24, 2014 Posted August 24, 2014 Over/under recycling of lights density. Through constant progression cycles of lights trajectory/momentum are seen on dimensional seperation of fielded symmetric stabiles. In other words a ray of light condenses inward its gravity (time constraints) allowing cylindrical waves of photon/lapse as density to emerge. On the other hand this density seen as light wavelengths are ejected via destabilizing orbits around their constant movement. This collapsable paradigms of movement converge outside it's momentum yet inside it's collapsed dimensions forwarding its 2nd dimension the ray as a cone of depth. Its rotational mass supersedes it's density so dispersal of cosmic radiation is pulsed around it's linear vertices of wavelengths. Allowing for dispersal dimensional properties take place. If light moves forward distance moves back and time slips by in conal wedges of verticamel constructs. Think lapse of momentum followed by decay of trajection. If forward resembles loss than takes on new meaning. Geometry as substitute only works when duality is present. Light and universal relativity work in this way also. Time as distance less depth has merit yet lacks it's duality momentum. May I know introduce a tesseract. Hyper depth without geometric distance from linear. In order for universal size constraints to fit a stabile system it's universal twin the atom must be rejected. I propose instead of tesseract bending conal properties in the form of terrasectional folding take place. Soon I will recollaborate on an earlier forum titled "photon" dissimilation located at paranormal news.com. In my own experience time can have conal restraints while still moving forward it's trajectory. An ocean of momentum stalled over it's under yet seen at center's edge. Hmmmm interesting still have yet to get more than 1 like on my other forum at my math forum.com
xyzt Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 Over/under recycling of lights density. Through constant progression cycles of lights trajectory/momentum are seen on dimensional seperation of fielded symmetric stabiles. In other words a ray of light condenses inward its gravity (time constraints) allowing cylindrical waves of photon/lapse as density to emerge. On the other hand this density seen as light wavelengths are ejected via destabilizing orbits around their constant movement. This collapsable paradigms of movement converge outside it's momentum yet inside it's collapsed dimensions forwarding its 2nd dimension the ray as a cone of depth. Its rotational mass supersedes it's density so dispersal of cosmic radiation is pulsed around it's linear vertices of wavelengths. Allowing for dispersal dimensional properties take place. If light moves forward distance moves back and time slips by in conal wedges of verticamel constructs. Think lapse of momentum followed by decay of trajection. If forward resembles loss than takes on new meaning. Geometry as substitute only works when duality is present. Light and universal relativity work in this way also. Time as distance less depth has merit yet lacks it's duality momentum. May I know introduce a tesseract. Hyper depth without geometric distance from linear. In order for universal size constraints to fit a stabile system it's universal twin the atom must be rejected. I propose instead of tesseract bending conal properties in the form of terrasectional folding take place. Soon I will recollaborate on an earlier forum titled "photon" dissimilation located at paranormal news.com. In my own experience time can have conal restraints while still moving forward it's trajectory. An ocean of momentum stalled over it's under yet seen at center's edge. Hmmmm interesting still have yet to get more than 1 like on my other forum at my math forum.com This doesn't belong in the main forum.
CaptainPanic Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 ! Moderator Note It is not clear what this thread is about. I've locked the thread while we wait for a review by other moderators.
Phi for All Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 ! Moderator Note After review, clarity has not improved. Putting words together and tossing them like a salad is inimical to good conversation. Please review your source material more carefully, to avoid having your threads go in the Trash.
Recommended Posts