Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Based on current scientific insights taking the data of DSM V and the Big Five personality traits as a fact should be in reach in twenty to a hundred years.

 

To reach this we need to find a way to avoid conflicts as much as possible. First of all you need to state a common goal that can in democracies get a majority:

 

The stated collective goal should then be having a long as possible fruitful life the least infringing on others. So you may believe and do what you want such as believing in magic as long as no infringement takes place. No problem. For then this should be judged on basis of the laws of logic, laws of nature, scientific insights into nature all within the appropriate boundaries.

 

This can only be done in a Parliamentary Democracy.

 

The ensuing possible discussion should be split in a seemingly contradictory way. One way is to have people that want to participate in the discussion do so in a safe environment that is void of ego. Methods like Theory U come into play given the topic and a talented well trained host to guard the process.

 

I'm thus willing to partake in such a venture and turn my ego off and only speak when asked and do so in a very soft manner.

 

I'm convinced that a great majority will reach the following conclusion, and it could also be that I reach another conclusion in the process. As I have done via the following method that is also needed. The reason why the latter that conflicts with the above seemingly slow yet faster method is that not all leaders with great ego's will be prepared to follow above route or they will misbehave during the process in order to frustrate the method.

 

The later method is a confrontational method in which I do use my ego in the process. Like I have done on this site acquiring a bad reputation and warning points to boot.

 

Here I just state what should be done and point towards the above method for explanation.

 

We need to state as an extra fundamental human right that a minimum wage M, a minimum basic income B and a maximum income I and a maximum personal wealth W on the basis of for western societies of a yet to establish formula of say: W = 50 I; I = 10 B; and B = 2 M. In the dutch context with M being € 12000,- W would be 12 million. This would give Greece within the Eurozone the possibility to devaluate and also keep if required a local economy protected via the minimum income that could be just digital and limited to local produce. (You don't always need to have to use that emergency brake).

 

This will "automatically" lead to a normally distributed income as I predict. You get more millionaires yet you have no billionaires or a situation of 1% of the population having 90% of the wealth.

 

The other thing that is needed is that every share should be - ultimately -on name of a human and digitally recorded during which period. Personal accountability for that period (which you can insure). The share holder has the say over the shares like normal. Investing in shares is thus the only quick way to become a millionaire. Of all taxes payed you have a 10% or so security build up in order to hold the income and wealth level if it for what ever reason drops. So pay a billion taxes gives both status and security. Monopolies aren't allowed at the moment anyway.

 

You need to organize openness on the goal logic and openness with logic on the relationship as well as conscientiousness in the legal system. This can be measured by quick thinking irony and lateral thought. 10% of the most open-minded judges go in a new R&D for temporary advice in order to reach consensus.

 

It will lead to copying this model all across society. In education, science and anywhere. Not having given R&D all the data by any MT is an infringement as is not having reached consensus. you get whacked by the judge and will behave on the stated norm. Ultimately very few court cases will occur.

 

Like a naphtha process the degree of flaming will subside as will the risk of explosions. The system will balance out. Why? Find out for yourself in the theory U method. Or claim that you are a fast thinking person who has active command or irony and lateral thought and let yourself be tested. Indeed by me. See who has got the biggest. Childish? Indeed yet you need to corner the Putin's of the world.

 

It will balance out in a way that ultimately maybe even in 20 years time we get a global community like the EU yet much better that work together in everything. no more atom bombs and only two police forces yin and yang keeping balance and checking that no ape builds bombs.

 

The route however is not a pacifistic one: when some apes fly into Twin Towers that is a casus belli. Do as the Romans and we Dutch colonized the world. Get in hit hard win the conventional war asap and have prior to that a foreign legion under say NATO leadership and air power of locals doing what the democratically led people want without the problem of corruption. Taliban, ISIS whatever is whacked down easily. Tried and tested. That works. The band of brothers yet not having legionnaires work in their own tribal area transforms a clan culture into a nation on its way towards a global community without nations as such.

 

Do we go to war with Putin then on the Ukraine? I hope not. It is inherently unstable of also our own doing. Nothing we do or don't do will guarantee success. Putin is a mental six year old both emotionally and in lateral thinking. Yet he is a quick thinking whopping logic on ego and whopping logic on authority. A psychopath as it used to be called. Only when the Russians become convinced via the success of R&D democracy will they see this and have him out of power with his dito cronies.

 

Other than western countries => R&D: let them come up with solutions.

 

It can be tested asap in Gaza. Not bombing the Palestinians with bombs but bombing them with a personal digital income of say $ 500,= a month for 1.5 million poor Palestinians. And apologize for keeping the wall up temporarily and make sure that all Palestinians are treated with respect. That will corner Hamas at a cost a fraction of the 54 billion spent on defense by Israel. The US can enforce this on Israel. Having BTW Israel also stop the settlers. I predict peace will break out in a few years and the Palestinian economy will generate enough to pay the own basic income. Israelis and Palestinians will live in peace.

 

You need to expect however a desperate attack by Hamas. You predict this and hope on a self denying professy. Yet you will be dammed if you let thugs decide the agenda.

 

In the current internet day and age this could work quickly and we would also get into balance with nature. Stop the overpopulation, and over-stressing of the system. New social norms and aspirations will ensue.

 

In short: state a sufficiently held common goal and do KISS, KBO via a SSG.

Edited by kristalris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.